Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Surrogates underpin ecological understanding and practise

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

O'Loughlin, Luke S.
Smith, M.D.
Willig, M.R.
Knapp, A.K.
Cuddington, K.
Hastings, A.
Foster, Claire N.
Sato, Chloe F.
Westgate, Martin J.
Barton, Philip S.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

A surrogate is a proxy measure for an attribute of true interest that is too difficult or costly to measure directly. Surrogacy is widely used in the environmental sciences, as well as in other disciplines such as clinical medicine and pharmacology (Lindenmayer et al. 2015a; Barton et al. 2015). In medicine, for example, easily-quantified properties of blood (such as cholesterol level) are regularly used to infer a patient’s health, risk of disease, or response to a medical treatment (Barton et al. 2015). Similarly, ecologists often monitor attributes such as carbon stocks, species richness or vegetation structure to infer the overall state of biodiversity, risk of undesired change, or response to a management intervention (Lindenmayer et al. 2015a). Surrogates are often used in applied ecology to inform decisions about biodiversity management, atmospheric pollution and conservation reserve selection (e.g. Rodrigues and Brooks 2007). However, proxy measures are also used widely in fundamental ecology. Ecosystem properties like productivity, fire severity and water quality are almost exclusively inferred from related but indirect measures (e.g. Keeley 2009). This implicit use of surrogacy is often not acknowledged outside of the applied disciplines. The conceptual and analytical frameworks developed to improve surrogacy in applied contexts therefore have much to offer research in fundamental ecology. Similarly, the causal frameworks and search for mechanism in fundamental ecology has much to offer applied surrogacy. In our view, integrating and communicating the lessons from each will lead to better outcomes for both. Here we consider how fundamental tenets from surrogate research, particularly those that deal with intrinsic uncertainty and risk, are underappreciated in broader ecological research. Our assertion is that explicit recognition of the use of surrogates will benefit all ecological research through improved evaluation of the accuracy, consistency and certainty of the inferences drawn from measures, regardless of the context.

Description

Keywords

Citation

O’Loughlin, L.S., Lindenmayer, D.B., Smith, M.D., Willig, M.R., Knapp, A.K., Cuddington, K., Hastings, A., Foster, C.N., Sato, C.F., Westgate, M.J. and Barton P.S. (2018). Surrogates underpin ecological understanding and practise. BioScience, 68, 640-642.

Source

BioScience

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads