Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A cost-benefit analysis of Vietnam’s 2006–2010 foot-and-mouth disease control program

dc.contributor.authorDo, Huong
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Hoa-Thi-Minh
dc.contributor.authorPham, Van Ha
dc.contributor.authorHa, Ky Dang
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-03T00:06:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2022-11-13T07:19:41Z
dc.description.abstractFoot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is arguably the most damaging animal disease, affecting three-quarters of the global livestock population. This paper provides a cost-benefit analysis of the first five-year program that used vaccination to contain and control FMD in an endemic country, Vietnam. Our spatial and dynamic model to simulate FMD outbreaks fully considered the distance among livestock premises, their herd sizes, and composition, all of which significantly affect FMD transmission. Our program benefit was consistently estimated due to the Law of Large Number and the design of pairing the control and treatment scenarios which allowed capturing the true benefit of each outbreak realization. The data used to monetize the program benefit were largely drawn from Vietnam's context and statistics, thus obviating the need to make many potentially undue assumptions. Meanwhile, the program costs were actual spending and allocated budget. We found that the vaccination program is highly cost-effective for Vietnam, yielding a net present value of US$136 million (in 2006 prices) over five years and a benefit-cost ratio of 5.7. Our results were robust to different assumptions about the vaccine effectiveness of the livestock unit.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/316468
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier B.V.en_AU
dc.sourcePreventive Veterinary Medicineen_AU
dc.subjectFoot-and-mouth diseaseen_AU
dc.subjectCost-benefit analysisen_AU
dc.subjectSpatial-dynamic transmissionen_AU
dc.subjectFoot-and-mouth vaccinationen_AU
dc.subjectVietnamen_AU
dc.titleA cost-benefit analysis of Vietnam’s 2006–2010 foot-and-mouth disease control programen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage8en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDo, Huong, Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Developmenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNguyen, Hoa, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPham, Van, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHa, Ky Dang, Department of Animal Healthen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidNguyen, Hoa, u4147512en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidPham, Van, u3207038en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor380100 - Applied economicsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu7157961xPUB177en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume206en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105703en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.elsevier.com/en-auen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167587722001362-main.pdf
Size:
2.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: