Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Soil physical quality under cattle grazing of a winter-fed brassica crop

Drewry, John; Paton, R J

Description

This 2-year study investigated the effects of winter brassica forage crop grazing treatments on soil physical properties on a Fragic Pallic soil, susceptible to compaction, in South Otago, New Zealand. Soil physical measurements including bulk density, percentage of pores >300 μm, macroporosity (air-filled porosity; percentage of pores >30 μm), total porosity, air permeability, and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K sat) were taken 1.5 and 4 months after completion of winter grazing in year 1,...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorDrewry, John
dc.contributor.authorPaton, R J
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:04:08Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:04:08Z
dc.identifier.issn0004-9573
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/85236
dc.description.abstractThis 2-year study investigated the effects of winter brassica forage crop grazing treatments on soil physical properties on a Fragic Pallic soil, susceptible to compaction, in South Otago, New Zealand. Soil physical measurements including bulk density, percentage of pores >300 μm, macroporosity (air-filled porosity; percentage of pores >30 μm), total porosity, air permeability, and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K sat) were taken 1.5 and 4 months after completion of winter grazing in year 1, and 2.5 months after grazing in year 2. Treatment main effects in year 1 for macroporosity were ungrazed crop (P < 0.05, 15.5%), established pasture (12.2%), crop on-off grazing (12.8%), crop grazed with back fence (9.6%), and current practice (strip grazing without a back-fence, 8.6%). During both winters the soil was generally more compact at 0.05-0.10 m depth than at 0.15-0.20 m, particularly for the current practice treatment, which may increase the risk of overland flow. Micro-topography differences between hump and hoof-hollow areas for the current practice treatment were also investigated during one sampling, with very low values of Ksat at 0-0.05 m in hoof-hollow areas (P < 0.05, 5 mm/h), compared with hump areas (129 mm/h). Overall, the crop on-off grazing treatment and, with some exceptions, the grazed with back fence treatment have some merit for reducing damage to soil physical properties compared with current practice.
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Soil Research
dc.subjectKeywords: Crops; Hydraulic conductivity; Microporosity; Surface topography; Pugging; Susceptible; Trading; Winter brassica forage crops; Soils; grazing; physical property; soil quality; Bulk Density; Conductivity; Porosity; Soil; Topography; Australasia; Eastern He Hydraulic conductivity; Pugging; Soil compaction; Treading
dc.titleSoil physical quality under cattle grazing of a winter-fed brassica crop
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.citationvolume43
dc.date.issued2005
local.identifier.absfor050302 - Land Capability and Soil Degradation
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub13529
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationDrewry, John, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationPaton, R J, AgResearch
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage525
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage531
local.identifier.doi10.1071/SR04122
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T07:53:43Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-23744462887
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator