Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Website Quality Indicators for Consumers

Griffiths, Kathleen; Christensen, Helen

Description

Background: The rating tool DISCERN was designed for use by consumers without content expertise to evaluate the quality of health information. There is some evidence that DISCERN may be a valid indicator of evidence-based website quality when applied by health professionals. However, it is not known if the tool is a valid measure of evidence-based quality when used by consumers. Since it is a lengthy instrument requiring training in its use, DISCERN may prove impractical for use by the typical...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Helen
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:52:03Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T22:52:03Z
dc.identifier.issn1438-8871
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/81378
dc.description.abstractBackground: The rating tool DISCERN was designed for use by consumers without content expertise to evaluate the quality of health information. There is some evidence that DISCERN may be a valid indicator of evidence-based website quality when applied by health professionals. However, it is not known if the tool is a valid measure of evidence-based quality when used by consumers. Since it is a lengthy instrument requiring training in its use, DISCERN may prove impractical for use by the typical consumer. It is therefore important to explore the validity of other simpler potential indicators of site quality such as Google PageRank.Objective: This study aimed to determine (1) whether the instrument DISCERN is a valid indicator of evidence-based Web content quality for consumers without specific mental health training, and (2) whether Google PageRank is an indicator of website content quality as measured by an evidence-based gold standard.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of depression websites using consumer and health professional raters. The main outcome measures were (1) site characteristics, (2) evidence-based quality of content as measured by evidence-based depression guidelines, (3) DISCERN scores, (4) Google PageRank, and (5) user satisfaction.Results: There was a significant association between evidence-based quality ratings and average DISCERN ratings both for consumers (r = 0.62, P = .001) and health professionals (r = 0.80, P < .001). Consumer and health professional DISCERN ratings were significantly correlated (r = 0.77, P < .001). The evidence-based quality score correlated with Google PageRank (r = 0.59, P = .002). However, the correlation between DISCERN scores and user satisfaction was higher than the correlation between Google PageRank and user satisfaction.Conclusions: DISCERN has potential as an indicator of content quality when used either by experts or by consumers. Google PageRank shows some promise as an automatic indicator of quality.
dc.publisherJournal of medical Internet Research
dc.sourceJournal of Medical Internet Research
dc.subjectKeywords: article; correlation analysis; evidence based practice; health care personnel; human; Internet; medical information system; quality control; satisfaction; validation process Consumer participation; Depressive disorder; Evaluation studies; Medical informatics
dc.titleWebsite Quality Indicators for Consumers
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.citationvolume7
dc.date.issued2005
local.identifier.absfor111714 - Mental Health
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub9680
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationGriffiths, Kathleen, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationChristensen, Helen, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1.11
local.identifier.doi10.2196/jmir.7.5.e55
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T10:48:50Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-29144523121
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator