Skip navigation
Skip navigation

How much ambiguity aversion?: Finding indifferences between Ellsberg's risky and ambiguous bets

Binmore, Ken; Stewart, Lisa; Voorhoeve, Alex


Experimental results on the Ellsberg paradox typically reveal behavior that is commonly interpreted as ambiguity aversion. The experiments reported in the current paper find the objective probabilities for drawing a red ball that make subjects indifferent between various risky and uncertain Ellsberg bets. They allow us to examine the predictive power of alternative principles of choice under uncertainty, including the objective maximin and Hurwicz criteria, the sure-thing principle, and the...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2012
Type: Journal article
Source: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-012-9155-3


File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Binmore_How_much_ambiguity_aversion?:_2012.pdf921.45 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy

Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator