Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Redesigning the Intermediate Course in Software Design

Johnson, Chris; Barnes, Ian

Description

Learning to design software ahead of directly constructing it is a significant hurdle in a Software Engineering education. Our University has run a course in software design for second-year undergraduate students since 1994. We describe the evaluation and improvement of the course as it evolved from 2000 to 2003, from a focus on reverse engineering to forward design, to add design patterns and associated programming tasks, then has redefined its objectives and re-aligned the assessment tasks...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Chris
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Ian
dc.contributor.editorAlison Young
dc.contributor.editorDenise Tolhurst
dc.coverage.spatialNewcastle Australia
dc.date.accessioned2004-12-01
dc.date.accessioned2005-03-10
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:33:44Z
dc.date.available2005-03-10
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:33:44Z
dc.date.created2004
dc.identifier.isbn1920682244
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/42612
dc.description.abstractLearning to design software ahead of directly constructing it is a significant hurdle in a Software Engineering education. Our University has run a course in software design for second-year undergraduate students since 1994. We describe the evaluation and improvement of the course as it evolved from 2000 to 2003, from a focus on reverse engineering to forward design, to add design patterns and associated programming tasks, then has redefined its objectives and re-aligned the assessment tasks with them. We evaluated the course in four ways: by the distribution of final grades, subjective evidence on the quality of answers in the final examination, student satisfaction surveys, and comparison of students' final grades with other computing courses taken at the same time. The attempt to improve the course by introducing homework tasks on design patterns did not improve the outcomes. But re-aligning the assessment with the objectives, and introducing a component on requirements specification, improved on most measures.
dc.format.extent12 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherCanberra, ACT: Dept. of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology and Computer Sciences Laboratory, Research School of Information Sciences and Engineering
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJoint Computer Science Technical Report Series (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology and Computer Sciences Laboratory, Research School of Information Sciences and Engineering): TR-CS-04-04
dc.subjectTR-CS
dc.subjectTeaching Software Design
dc.titleRedesigning the Intermediate Course in Software Design
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paper
local.description.refereedno
local.identifier.eprintid2887
local.rights.ispublishedyes
local.identifier.absfor089999 - Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4222028xPUB271
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationAustralian National University
local.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Computer Science, FEIT
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T09:21:26Z
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
TR-CS-04-04.pdf168.19 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator