Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis

Jones, Natalie A.; Perez, Pascal; Measham, Thomas; Kelly, Gail J.; D'Aquino, Patrick; Daniell, Katherine; Dray, Anne; Ferrand, Niels

Description

Participatory modeling is increasingly recognized as an effective way to assist collective decision-making processes in the domain of natural resource management. This article introduces a framework for evaluating projects that have adopted a participatory modeling approach. This evaluation framework-known as the "Protocol of Canberra"-was developed through a collaboration between French and Australian researchers engaged in participatory modeling and evaluation research. The framework seeks to...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorJones, Natalie A.
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorMeasham, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Gail J.
dc.contributor.authorD'Aquino, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorDaniell, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorDray, Anne
dc.contributor.authorFerrand, Niels
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:36:20Z
dc.identifier.issn0364-152X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/35211
dc.description.abstractParticipatory modeling is increasingly recognized as an effective way to assist collective decision-making processes in the domain of natural resource management. This article introduces a framework for evaluating projects that have adopted a participatory modeling approach. This evaluation framework-known as the "Protocol of Canberra"-was developed through a collaboration between French and Australian researchers engaged in participatory modeling and evaluation research. The framework seeks to assess the extent to which different participatory modeling initiatives not only modify perceptions among and interactions between participants, but also contribute to collective decision-making. The article discusses the development of the framework and it's application to three case-studies, two from Australia and one from the Pacific Island of the Republic of Kiribati. The article concludes with some comments for future use of the framework in a range of participatory modeling contexts.
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.sourceEnvironmental Management (New York)
dc.subjectKeywords: Australia; Canberra; Case analysis; Case-studies; Collective decision; Complex systems; Evaluation framework; Evaluation research; Kiribati; Modeling approach; Natural resource management; Pacific islands; Science evaluation; Complexation; Natural resourc Complex systems science; Evaluation; Modeling; Participation
dc.titleEvaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume44
dc.date.issued2009
local.identifier.absfor050209 - Natural Resource Management
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3154186xPUB122
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationJones, Natalie A., University of Queensland
local.contributor.affiliationPerez, Pascal, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationMeasham, Thomas, CSIRO
local.contributor.affiliationKelly, Gail J., Bureau of Rural Sciences
local.contributor.affiliationD'Aquino, Patrick, IAC/CIRAD
local.contributor.affiliationDaniell, Katherine, CEMAGREF
local.contributor.affiliationDray, Anne, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationFerrand, Niels, CEMAGREF
local.contributor.affiliationDaniell, Katherine, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1180
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1195
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s00267-009-9391-8
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T09:52:35Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-73449106050
local.identifier.thomsonID000272615300013
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Jones_Evaluating_Participatory_2009.pdf305.19 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator