Skip navigation
Skip navigation

The Natural History of Ooliths: Franz Ernst Brückmann's Treatise of 1721 and its Significance for the Understanding of Oolites

Burne, Robert; Eade, John (Chris); Paul, Josef

Description

Franz Br�ckmann wrote his treatise on oolites in 1721. We present here an English translation of his Latin text which describes the following topics; derivation of the name �oolith� and its synonyms; interpretation as accumulations of fish-eggs; classification as stones; occurrence and diversity; environments of deposition and processes of lithification; explanations for the large quantities of eggs found; evidence for their biological origin; evidence for their biological associations; the...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorBurne, Robert
dc.contributor.authorEade, John (Chris)
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Josef
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:09:01Z
dc.identifier.issn2193-1305
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/28845
dc.description.abstractFranz Br�ckmann wrote his treatise on oolites in 1721. We present here an English translation of his Latin text which describes the following topics; derivation of the name �oolith� and its synonyms; interpretation as accumulations of fish-eggs; classification as stones; occurrence and diversity; environments of deposition and processes of lithification; explanations for the large quantities of eggs found; evidence for their biological origin; evidence for their biological associations; the distinction between ooliths and pisoliths; and localities of occurrence. We provide a commentary on Br�ckmann�s text, and then review the impact of his work by tracing the subsequent development of research on Oolites up to the early twentieth century. We conclude that Br�ckmann�s treatise is best regarded as a review paper that provided a platform for later research. His most significant contribution was to view oolites as accumulations of petrified biological remains rather than as �sports of nature�. Some of Br�ckmann�s near contemporaries such as Da Costa and De Saussure doubted that fish eggs could lithify and, although conceding their sedimentary origin, preferred to regard them as mineral concretions. Major developments in the sciences of stratigraphy, palaeontology, microbiology, microscopy, comparative sedimentology, and petrology would be required before more significant advances could be made on Br�ckmann�s interpretations.
dc.publisherMartin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg
dc.sourceHallesches Jahrbuch fur Geowissenschaften
dc.source.urihttps://public.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/index.php/hjg/article/view/137
dc.titleThe Natural History of Ooliths: Franz Ernst Brückmann's Treatise of 1721 and its Significance for the Understanding of Oolites
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume34
dc.date.issued2012
local.identifier.absfor219999 - History and Archaeology not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9910377xPUB60
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationBurne, Robert, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationEade, John (Chris), College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationPaul, Josef, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universitat
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage93
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage114
local.identifier.absseo959999 - Cultural Understanding not elsewhere classified
dc.date.updated2020-11-15T07:29:35Z
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access via publisher website
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Burne_The_Natural_History_of_2012.pdf893.73 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator