Cosmic Perspectives and the Myths We Need to Survive

Date

2019

Authors

Lineweaver, Charles

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

International Big History Association

Abstract

Big history can be defined as the attempt to understand the integrated history of the cosmos, Earth, life and humanity. Cosmic perspectives and biological evolution are the main scientific ingredients that can convert and broaden history into big history. The aim of this paper is to describe a dilemma that such a scientific, Darwinian big history must face: the inevitable incompatibility between an objective scientific search for truth and an evolutionary compulsion for brains to harbor useful fictions — the myths we need to survive. Science supports both sides of this dilemma. New and improved cosmic perspectives can’t just be scientifically accurate. To be of use they must leave room for the myths we humans need to survive. But, what are those myths? I discuss and question whether the following ideas qualify as such myths: a belief in an objective meaning for human life, humanism/speciesism, human free will and stewardship of the Earth.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

The Journal of Big History

Type

Journal article

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads