Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Keith, Heather
Vardon, Michael
Stein, John A.
Stein, Janet L.
Lindenmayer, David B

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Decisions about natural resource management are frequently complex and vexed, often leading to public policy compromises. Discord between environmental and economic metrics creates problems in assessing trade-offs between different current or potential resource uses. Ecosystem accounts, which quantify ecosystems and their benefits for human well-being consistent with national economic accounts, provide exciting opportunities to contribute significantly to the policy process. We advanced the application of ecosystem accounts in a regional case study by explicitly and spatially linking impacts of human and natural activities on ecosystem assets and services to their associated industries. This demonstrated contributions of ecosystems beyond the traditional national accounts. Our results revealed that native forests would provide greater benefits from their ecosystem services of carbon sequestration, water yield, habitat provisioning and recreational amenity if harvesting for timber production ceased, thus allowing forests to continue growing to older ages.

Description

Citation

Keith, H., Vardon, M., Stein, J.A., Stein, J.S. and Lindenmayer, D.B. (2017). Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 1683-1692.

Source

Nature Ecology & Evolution

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until