Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Evidence review of Indigenous culture for health and wellbeing : Supplementary Table

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bourke, Sarah
Wright, Alyson
Guthrie, Jill
Russell, Lachlan
Dunbar, Terry
Lovett, Raymond

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

There is growing evidence that the cultures of Indigenous peoples influences their health and wellbeing. We reviewed articles published between 1997–2017 that studied the relationship between culture, and health and wellbeing outcomes, and used an adapted version of the Agency of Healthcare Research Quality Framework to determine their strength of evidence. We examined the literature grouped by six cultural domains: country and caring for country, knowledge and beliefs, language, self-determination, family and kinship, and cultural expression. Seventy-two publications were included in the review, focusing on populations from Australia, Canada, the United States, and New Zealand. Across the literature there were conceptual variations in defining and measuring culture, and in the comparison of differing social constructs across Indigenous groups. The literature largely report that culture is significantly and positively associated with physical health, social and emotional wellbeing, and reduces risk-taking behaviours. The majority of publications presented evidence on the impact that culture, or culturally-based interventions, have on social and emotional wellbeing outcomes. The strength of evidence from most publications was assessed as moderate or low quality, and was limited by a lack of reliable and valid measures, population level studies, and longitudinal studies. Cultural domains including language, cultural expression and connection to country were more likely to be reported in quantitative studies, whereas cultural domains of knowledge, beliefs, kinship and family were more likely to be reported using qualitative methods. Those studies which used mixed-methods approaches were more likely to be assessed as high or moderate quality. This review encourages future research to consider adopting mixed methods approaches to investigate the complex, causal pathways through which culture influences health and wellbeing for Indigenous populations.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description