Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Footprints in time: the longitudinal study of Indigenous children: guide for the uninitiated

Dodson, Mick; Hunter, Boyd; McKay, Matthew

Description

The Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children is arguably a landmark for the development of an effective policy to address Indigenous disadvantage early in the life cycle. This paper highlights how the study might inform policy-makers by providing some historical context about the survey design and collection. The brief history of LSIC provides an extended rationale for the need for the data and directly reflects on the survey design and methodology. The paper includes an analysis of the...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorDodson, Mick
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Boyd
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-26T05:20:17Z
dc.date.available2013-06-26T05:20:17Z
dc.identifier.citationDodson, M., Hunter, B. & McKay, M. (2012). Footprints in time: the longitudinal study of Indigenous children: guide for the uninitiated. Retrieved June 26, 2013, from http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/fm2012/fm91/fm91g.html
dc.identifier.issn1030-2646
dc.identifier.issn1832-8318
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/10127
dc.description.abstractThe Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children is arguably a landmark for the development of an effective policy to address Indigenous disadvantage early in the life cycle. This paper highlights how the study might inform policy-makers by providing some historical context about the survey design and collection. The brief history of LSIC provides an extended rationale for the need for the data and directly reflects on the survey design and methodology. The paper includes an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of LSIC, with reference to a few selected variables that may be useful in potential research. Some useful research questions are identified that LSIC data may be used to address, and the authors reflect on growing research that is using LSIC data. The community engagement strategy has been integral key to maximising participation and retention rates, especially the use of Indigenous interviewers to elicit potentially sensitive information. The main constraint for analysing the study is the relatively small sample size, which limits the statistical power of the resulting analysis.
dc.format14 pages
dc.publisherAustralian Institute of Family Studies
dc.rightsPermission given to deposit article in ANU institutional repository - email, Australian Institute of Family Studies, dated 26/06/13
dc.sourceFamily Matters 91 (2012): 69-82
dc.source.urihttp://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/fm2012/fm91/fm91g.html
dc.titleFootprints in time: the longitudinal study of Indigenous children: guide for the uninitiated
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notes"This paper uses unit record data from the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children (LSIC). LSIC was initiated and is funded and managed by FaHCSIA. The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to FaHCSIA or the Indigenous people and their communities involved in the study" - page 82
dc.date.issued2012
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.aifs.gov.au/
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationDodson, Mick, ANU, National Centre for Indigenous Studies
local.contributor.affiliationHunter, Boyd, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research
local.contributor.affiliationMcKay, Matthew, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
Dodson_FootprintsTime2012.pdf1.24 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator