Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities and key influencing factors in coastal households, Bangladesh

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Mondal, Shuvagato
Wangdi, Kinley
Gray, Darren James
Kelly, Matthew
Sarma, Haribondhu

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This study assessed the accessibility and determinants of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities in Bangladesh's climate-sensitive coastal region, which is highly vulnerable to sea-level rise, salinity intrusion and extreme weather events. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to July 2023, involving 471 households across nine subdistricts within three coastal zones using a three-stage cluster sampling technique. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the associated factors, considering WASH indicators (as defined by the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program) as outcomes and sociodemographic characteristics as exposure variables. Findings revealed that, 56.9 % of households had limited access to drinking water, 43.3 % lacked improved sanitation, and 48.2 % were without basic hygiene facilities, while only 10.6 % had basic access to all three WASH services. Compared to the richest households, poor households (asset-based index) were 76 % less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.24, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.16–0.54) to have water access. Households located in the southeastern region had 1.67 (AOR: 1.67, 95 % CI: 1.02–2.74) times higher odds of having water access than those in the southwestern part. Larger households and those headed by fishermen were 39 % (AOR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.40–0.93) and 70 % (AOR: 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.65) less likely to have sanitation access compared with smaller households and those headed by service holders, respectively. Households having adults with primary incomplete or only primary education were significantly associated with reduced access to hygiene and combined WASH facilities, respectively, whereas wealth was a significant factor for WASH facilities. The findings thus underscore the need for targeted interventions including subsidised disadvantaged occupational groups and community-based education programs to improve WASH access in this vulnerable zone.

Description

Citation

Source

Acta Tropica

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until