Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Limitations of the Double-Observer Method for Estimating Population Size: A Case Study on the Southern Greater Glider (<i>Petauroides volans</i>)

dc.contributor.authorKremer, Xanderen
dc.contributor.authorGracanin, Anaen
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, David B.en
dc.contributor.authorYoungentob, Kara N.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-09T17:41:21Z
dc.date.available2026-08-09T17:41:21Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-19en
dc.description.abstractMonitoring the size of wildlife populations is crucial for the effective implementation of conservation management strategies, and a variety of methods have been developed for this purpose. One such approach is the double-observer method, which has recently gained prominence in monitoring programs for the southern greater glider (Petauroides volans), an iconic nocturnal arboreal marsupial native to Australia. While this method has been successfully applied at lower population densities, its reliability and applicability at higher-density sites has not been evaluated. This case study represents the first instance of an investigation and discussion on the application of the double-observer method in greater glider monitoring at higher-density sites. We found that in higher-density areas, the proximity of individuals makes it more difficult to reliably distinguish unique (individual) animals between observers, and the increased number of observations per transect extends the time required for data recording. Transects with more animal observations showed significantly longer delays between observers (z = 5.062, p < 0.001). Additionally, discrepancies in the number of animal observations between observers significantly altered the intended 15-20 min interval (z = 2.71, p = 0.007). Deviations from the standard 15-20 min interval between observers were common, occurring at 44 of the 66 sites, where actual time-lags ranged from 0 to 64 min. Consequently, longer intervals increased the potential for animal movement, while shorter intervals risked observer independence. These factors, combined with our experience applying the double-observer method across sites with markedly different greater glider densities, suggest that the critical non-movement assumption may be violated more frequently than previously recognised. We discuss the limitations of applying the double-observer method to survey high-density populations and recommend prioritising research on greater glider movement patterns and alternative survey techniques to improve the accuracy and reliability of monitoring programs at higher-density sites.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent11en
dc.identifier.otherWOS:001726542400001en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-4766-4088/work/222899418en
dc.identifier.scopus105034012272en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733814139
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights©2026 The authors en
dc.sourceConservationen
dc.subjectAbundanceen
dc.subjectArboreal marsupialen
dc.subjectMark-recaptureen
dc.subjectMonitoringen
dc.subjectPopulation sizeen
dc.titleLimitations of the Double-Observer Method for Estimating Population Size: A Case Study on the Southern Greater Glider (&lt;i&gt;Petauroides volans&lt;/i&gt;)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationKremer, Xander; Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationGracanin, Ana; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationLindenmayer, David B.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationYoungentob, Kara N.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume6en
local.identifier.doi10.3390/conservation6010012en
local.identifier.pure9dee1849-abff-405c-a7be-7c541ca826cben
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=anu_research_portal_plus2&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001726542400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPLen
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
conservation-06-00012.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format