Opportunity for health and wellbeing co-benefits of climate adaptation policies and programs: a Delphi study in the Australian Capital Territory

dc.contributor.authorLal, Aen
dc.contributor.authorBecvarik, Z Aen
dc.contributor.authorSugiura, Tomokoen
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Danielen
dc.contributor.authorTsheten, Ten
dc.contributor.authorWhite, L Ven
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, E Ien
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Aen
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-16T01:35:40Z
dc.date.available2025-12-16T01:35:40Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-18en
dc.description.abstractThe integration of health and wellbeing co-benefits into climate policy and decision-making is limited. This study aimed to identify health and wellbeing co-benefits of climate change adaptation and mitigation, assess the perceived relevance and importance of co-benefits to policy and programme evaluation, and assess data availability to measure co-benefits. The relevance, importance, and data availability of 24 co-benefits of climate policies and programmes identified from a prior scoping review were surveyed using Delphi methodology by experts across diverse policy areas using the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) as a case study. We created an opportunity score that represented the combined relevance and importance for each co-benefit. Experts also identified additional co-benefits and provided qualitative responses, with agreement with the first round results assessed in the second round. We found that co-benefits that were rated as highly relevant were generally rated as highly important. The top five co-benefits based on opportunity score (relevance × importance) included: reduced mental health burden; increased comfort in the home; improved disaster preparedness; improvement in physical health; and economic benefits from averted healthcare costs. A high degree of consensus was achieved for all five top co-benefits, as well as those considered not relevant or important, indicating agreement on highest and lowest priority co-benefits across a range of climate change interventions and government directorates. While most co-benefits with high opportunity scores had available data, the availability of quality data was a key concern, with over half the identified co-benefits having no available data or uncertain data availability. Future research needs to develop a standardised methodology to measure co-benefits that incorporates indicators considered most relevant and important by experts, with the prioritisation of co-benefits in this Delphi study providing a guide for research and evaluation in other contexts beyond the ACT.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research is commissioned and funded by the ACT Government. en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent14en
dc.identifier.issn2752-5309en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-7062-1468/work/213941112en
dc.identifier.otherWOS:001551771000001en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-7084-1524/work/195357214en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0009-0002-5309-5683/work/195530184en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-8941-0046/work/195539950en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0009-0004-3033-4906/work/195549921en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-8071-5721/work/195569212en
dc.identifier.scopus105020810037en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733795211
dc.language.isoenen
dc.provenanceOriginal content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.en
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s)en
dc.sourceEnvironmental Research: Healthen
dc.titleOpportunity for health and wellbeing co-benefits of climate adaptation policies and programs: a Delphi study in the Australian Capital Territoryen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationLal, A; National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Centre of Epidemiology for Policy and Practice, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBecvarik, Z A; National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Centre of Epidemiology for Policy and Practice, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationSugiura, Tomoko; Research School of Population Health, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMiller, Daniel; Research School of Population Health, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationTsheten, T; Department of Applied Epidemiology, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationWhite, L V; The University of Sydneyen
local.contributor.affiliationWalsh, E I; Research School of Population Health, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationRichardson, A; The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume3en
local.identifier.doi10.1088/2752-5309/adf45fen
local.identifier.pureb57bddec-e35d-45ba-bcf9-500fde395eb5en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:001551771000001en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020810037en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lal_2025_Environ._Res._Health_3_035005.pdf
Size:
2.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format