Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Explaining Command Style

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Miller, Charles

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Command style is crucial to military effectiveness. In modern warfare, a key component of command style is decentralization. The military effectiveness literature generally agrees that decentralization is a desirable trait. Why then would a military not adopt decentralization? I argue that the degree of centralization is primarily a function of prewar state decisions to build up trained manpower, and wartime losses. The larger the gap between the state’s trained manpower at the beginning of the war and its ultimate land force needs, the more likely it is that the army will be compelled to embark on rapid mobilization. Since decentralization depends on sufficient trained manpower, this will imply more centralization. However early war differences will fade as losses mount. I illustrate this theory with respect to two combatants in World War II: Germany and the United Kingdom.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Security Studies

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until