Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Impact of inputs, information, and financial services on the adoption of a biofortified crop by women farmers in Uganda

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Buehren, Niklas
Chowdhury, Shyamal
Papineni, Sreelakshmi
Sulaiman, Munshi

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Smallholder farmers in low- and middle-income countries face several constraints to technology adoption. We test the relative efficacy of interventions designed to incentivize the production and consumption of a biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato crop by female farmers in Uganda. Through a clustered randomized controlled trial involving more than 8000 female farmers across 210 communities, we track the impact of the interventions on adoption, consumption, and health outcomes, both in the short term and long term. Our findings suggest that the provision of inputs and agricultural extension is an effective approach to adoption, leading over 60% of households to cultivate and 50% to consume the crop. Nutrition training emphasizing the crop's health benefits has limited impact on cultivation, but it leads 20% of households to consume the biofortified crop. Combining the two approaches with supplementary credit and insurance products has limited marginal effects on adoption. We also observe improvements in dietary diversity resulting from the tested interventions, along with spillover effects through social networks in neighboring communities. We find little evidence of treatment effects on higher-order outcomes such as visual acuity, child health and nutrition, or income.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until