Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Natural pest control in citrus as an ecosystem service: Integrating ecology, economics and management at the farm scale

dc.contributor.authorColloff, Matthew J.en
dc.contributor.authorLindsay, Elizabeth A.en
dc.contributor.authorCook, David C.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-01T17:41:23Z
dc.date.available2026-01-01T17:41:23Z
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.description.abstractWhile we were completing a year-long survey of soil invertebrates in eight citrus orchards in South Australia, there was an outbreak of Kelly's citrus thrips (Pezothrips kellyanus). Four growers in our survey reported their orchards were free of thrips, while the others reported suffering serious economic damage. A retrospective analysis, using data from the invertebrate survey, showed that orchards without thrips damage all had dense ground cover (perennial grasses, diverse forbs and with a deep litter layer), whereas orchards with thrips damage all had patchy ground cover (bare mineral soil with scattered annual weeds or a sparse monoculture of lucerne or oats and no litter layer). Orchards with dense ground cover and no thrips damage had far denser populations of predatory mesostigmatid mites (mean 6471±692m-2 1 SE) compared with orchards with patchy ground cover and thrips damage (1097±126m-2). Most Mesostigmata (total 17 spp.) were generalist predators, capable of feeding on thrips larvae when they move from the fruit to the soil to pupate. We suggest the absence of thrips damage is causally related to the presence of a diverse, abundant fauna of natural enemies, enhanced by good quality ground cover habitat and that growers with no thrips damage are benefitting from the ecosystem service of natural pest control. Using three scenarios of increasing severity of thrips damage (10%, 20% and 40%), we estimated the mean value of natural pest control of thrips as an ecosystem service was A$ 2640, A$ 4610 and A$ 8540 per hectare for those orchards that benefited from the service, whereas those orchards that received no such benefit potentially lost A$ 1970, A$ 3260 and A$ 5850 respectively. Our findings led to the planting of improved ground cover as habitat for predators by three growers, and the development of a commercial predator biocontrol agent for thrips by a fourth, based on mites harvested from his orchard. Growers who had effective natural pest control of thrips are more likely to have greater economic resilience in relation to price volatility shocks than those growers who do not benefit from this ecosystem service.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are grateful to the Riverland citrus growers who allowed us access to their properties and their records, as well as to staff of the Australian Landscape Trust for assistance with project co-ordination. We thank David E. Walter (Museum of Alberta) for data on feeding preferences of mesostigmatid mites, Bruce Halliday and Geir Fokstuen (CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences) for mite identification and field assistance, respectively; Greg Baker (South Australian Research and Development Institute) for information about biocontrol of insect pests of citrus and Laurence Mound (CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences) for many useful discussions about the biology of thrips. Finally, we thank Saul Cunningham and Shuang Liu (CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences) for providing insightful reviews of the manuscript. This work was funded by a grant from the Natural Heritage Trust to the Australian Landscape Trust.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent8en
dc.identifier.issn1049-9644en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-3765-0627/work/171152884en
dc.identifier.scopus84883348874en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733801787
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceBiological Controlen
dc.subjectConservation biological controlen
dc.subjectEconomic resilienceen
dc.subjectGround coveren
dc.subjectHabitat managementen
dc.subjectReplacement cost valuationen
dc.subjectThripsen
dc.titleNatural pest control in citrus as an ecosystem service: Integrating ecology, economics and management at the farm scaleen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage177en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage170en
local.contributor.affiliationColloff, Matthew J.; CSIROen
local.contributor.affiliationLindsay, Elizabeth A.; CSIROen
local.contributor.affiliationCook, David C.; CSIROen
local.identifier.citationvolume67en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.017en
local.identifier.pure9383f7db-09e8-46f7-9f4d-969123720edeen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84883348874en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads