Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Opportunities for a national genomic data governance framework in Australia: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorCannizzo, Fabianen
dc.contributor.authorVidgen, Miranda E.en
dc.contributor.authorMcWhirter, Rebekahen
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Alanen
dc.contributor.authorOtlowski, Margareten
dc.contributor.authorRizzi, Marcoen
dc.contributor.authorHensley, Jasmineen
dc.contributor.authorNewson, Ainsley J.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-16T21:41:05Z
dc.date.available2025-12-16T21:41:05Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-14en
dc.description.abstractBackground As with other countries, Australia is seeking to make efficient use of genomic data for use in research, clinical medicine and population health. However, to enable cross jurisdictional consistency in the management of and access to data, it will first need to establish a national framework for governing genomic data. To this end, ethical, legal and social issues are often discussed. However, the literature offers little evidence-based support for such a framework. Methods To address this literature gap, we systematically reviewed two databases (Scopus and PubMed) for research articles that discussed issues and opportunities for enacting genomic data governance frameworks in the domains of research, genomic medicine and public (population) health in the Australian context. Results Thirty-one relevant articles were included and were analysed using inductive content analysis. Our findings identified that opportunities for implementing a national genomic data governance framework concerned defining roles for patients in data governance, data management processes and increasing the public acceptance of genomic data use in healthcare and research. Additionally, they highlight differences in the opportunities and priorities for clinical and research genomics that hinder further advancement of data governance. Conclusions Our synthesis of the current literature on genomic data governance suggests that the current focus on individual consent as the primary mechanism for protecting data subjects and different priorities in clinical and research governance need to be addressed. Given the significance of the role of consent procedures and differences in clinical and research data in generating a data governance framework, our findings hence reveal a critical gap in the research literature. Advancing a national genomic data governance framework will require greater consensus and clarity regarding the application of ethical principles across jurisdictions and institutions.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors of this publication are members of the LINEAGE: Law, Sociology and Ethics in Data Governance for Genomics Consortium.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent15en
dc.identifier.otherWOS:001550045000001en
dc.identifier.otherPubMed:40813664en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-9409-8074/work/190897269en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-5159-8677/work/202374089en
dc.identifier.scopus105013202617en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733795624
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.en
dc.sourceBMC Medical Ethicsen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectDataen
dc.subjectEthical, legal and social issues (ELSI)en
dc.subjectGenomicen
dc.subjectGovernanceen
dc.subjectNational frameworken
dc.titleOpportunities for a national genomic data governance framework in Australia: a systematic reviewen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationCannizzo, Fabian; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationVidgen, Miranda E.; QIMR Berghoferen
local.contributor.affiliationMcWhirter, Rebekah; ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationPetersen, Alan; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationOtlowski, Margaret; University of Tasmaniaen
local.contributor.affiliationRizzi, Marco; University of Western Australiaen
local.contributor.affiliationHensley, Jasmine; University of Western Australiaen
local.contributor.affiliationNewson, Ainsley J.; The University of Sydneyen
local.identifier.citationvolume26en
local.identifier.doi10.1186/s12910-025-01273-7en
local.identifier.purefc062583-60b3-4e64-ad73-30a4d06bbd9fen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=anu_research_portal_plus2&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001550045000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPLen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013202617en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads