Quantifying energy transition vulnerability helps more just and inclusive decarbonization

dc.contributor.authorShen, Yifanen
dc.contributor.authorShi, Xunpengen
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Zhiboen
dc.contributor.authorGrafton, R. Quentinen
dc.contributor.authorYu, Jianen
dc.contributor.authorShan, Yulien
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T12:23:57Z
dc.date.available2025-05-23T12:23:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01en
dc.description.abstractThe COP28 agreement signals “beginning of the end” of the fossil fuel era, calling on countries to contribute to global efforts to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems in a just, orderly and equitable manner. While a quantitative assessment of country’s vulnerability in energy transition is a prerequisite for national and international policy makers to ensure a just and inclusive transition, it is notably absent in the existing research. Here, we develop a conceptual framework based on the vulnerability scoping diagram (VSD) method to assess differences in energy transition vulnerability across countries, with a specific focus on the challenges associated with transitioning away from fossil fuels. The resulting energy transition vulnerability index (ETVI) scores reveal that countries in the Global South generally exhibit higher vulnerability in their energy transition compared to those in the Global North, and this gap has widened over the past decade. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the decade-long trend of continuous decline in global energy transition vulnerability. This study also provides two important applications of ETVI scores, aligning them with major global sustainable development agenda. Firstly, we identify substantial differences in the dynamics of transition vulnerability across seven major party groups in the international climate change negotiations and distinguish four energy transition statuses in relation to achieving global climate goals: Stressful, Leapfrog, Potential Challenges, and Less Painful. Secondly, we demonstrate crucial synergies between energy transition resilience and the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (72104184, 72174056, and 72373172), and Interdisciplinary Joint Research Fund of Tongji University (2022-4-YB-14).en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.issn2752-6542en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-0048-9083/work/184104668en
dc.identifier.scopus85207388976en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207388976&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733752248
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.en
dc.sourcePNAS Nexusen
dc.titleQuantifying energy transition vulnerability helps more just and inclusive decarbonizationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationShen, Yifan; Shanghai Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationShi, Xunpeng; University of Technology Sydneyen
local.contributor.affiliationZhao, Zhibo; Qilu University of Technologyen
local.contributor.affiliationGrafton, R. Quentin; The Hub for Vietnam Policy Studies, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationYu, Jian; Central University of Finance and Economicsen
local.contributor.affiliationShan, Yuli; University of Birminghamen
local.identifier.citationvolume3en
local.identifier.doi10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae427en
local.identifier.pure316f5aa4-29bf-4fc8-83a2-6c8d12483b9cen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85207388976en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads