Mechanistic reconciliation of community and invasion ecology

dc.contributor.authorLatombe, Guillaumeen
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, David M.en
dc.contributor.authorMcGeoch, Melodie A.en
dc.contributor.authorAltwegg, Resen
dc.contributor.authorCatford, Jane A.en
dc.contributor.authorChase, Jonathan M.en
dc.contributor.authorCourchamp, Francken
dc.contributor.authorEsler, Karen J.en
dc.contributor.authorJeschke, Jonathan M.en
dc.contributor.authorLandi, Pietroen
dc.contributor.authorMeasey, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorMidgley, Guy F.en
dc.contributor.authorMinoarivelo, Henintsoa O.en
dc.contributor.authorRodger, James G.en
dc.contributor.authorHui, Cangen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T23:32:01Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T23:32:01Z
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.description.abstractCommunity and invasion ecology have mostly grown independently. There is substantial overlap in the processes captured by different models in the two fields, and various frameworks have been developed to reduce this redundancy and synthesize information content. Despite broad recognition that community and invasion ecology are interconnected, a process-based framework synthesizing models across these two fields is lacking. Here we review 65 representative community and invasion models and propose a common framework articulated around six processes (dispersal, drift, abiotic interactions, within-guild interactions, cross-guild interactions, and genetic changes). The framework is designed to synthesize the content of the two fields, provide a general perspective on their development, and enable their comparison. The application of this framework and of a novel method based on network theory reveals some lack of coherence between the two fields, despite some historical similarities. Community ecology models are characterized by combinations of multiple processes, likely reflecting the search for an overarching theory to explain community assembly and structure, drawing predominantly on interaction processes, but also accounting largely for the other processes. In contrast, most models in invasion ecology invoke fewer processes and focus more on interactions between introduced species and their novel biotic and abiotic environment. The historical dominance of interaction processes and their independent developments in the two fields is also reflected in the lower level of coherence for models involving interactions, compared to models involving dispersal, drift, and genetic changes. It appears that community ecology, with a longer history than invasion ecology, has transitioned from the search for single explanations for patterns observed in nature to investigate how processes may interact mechanistically, thereby generating and testing hypotheses. Our framework paves the way for a similar transition in invasion ecology, to better capture the dynamics of multiple alien species introduced in complex communities. Reciprocally, applying insights from invasion to community ecology will help us understand and predict the future of ecological communities in the Anthropocene, in which human activities are weakening species’ natural boundaries. Ultimately, the successful integration of the two fields could advance a predictive ecology that is urgently required in a rapidly changing world.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge financial support from the South African Research Chairs Initiative (NRF grant 89967 to CH) and the DSI‐NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology for the workshop in Stellenbosch in September 2018 that brought 16 researchers together to discuss the ideas that resulted in this paper. GL is supported by the BiodivERsA‐Belmont Forum Project “Alien Scenarios” (FWF project no I 4011‐B32). MM acknowledges support from ARC DP200101680. JMJ acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; grant JE 288/9‐2) and the AlienScenarios BiodivERsA‐Belmont Forum project (BMBF grant 01LC1807B). JMC was supported by the German Centre of Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig (funded by the German Research Foundation; FZT 118). FC is supported by the Invasion Biology AXA Chair and the AlienScenarios BiodivERsA‐Belmont Forum project. RA was supported by the NRF (grant 119125). GMF was supported by the NRF (grant 118591). DMR acknowledges support from the Oppenheimer Memorial Trust (grant 18576/03).en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-0582-5960/work/171152282en
dc.identifier.scopus85101859061en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101859061&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755613
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors.en
dc.sourceEcosphereen
dc.subjectcommunity ecologyen
dc.subjecthypothesisen
dc.subjectinvasion ecologyen
dc.subjectmodelen
dc.subjectprocessen
dc.subjecttheoryen
dc.titleMechanistic reconciliation of community and invasion ecologyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationLatombe, Guillaume; University of Viennaen
local.contributor.affiliationRichardson, David M.; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMcGeoch, Melodie A.; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationAltwegg, Res; University of Cape Townen
local.contributor.affiliationCatford, Jane A.; King's College Londonen
local.contributor.affiliationChase, Jonathan M.; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzigen
local.contributor.affiliationCourchamp, Franck; Université Paris-Saclayen
local.contributor.affiliationEsler, Karen J.; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationJeschke, Jonathan M.; Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheriesen
local.contributor.affiliationLandi, Pietro; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMeasey, John; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMidgley, Guy F.; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMinoarivelo, Henintsoa O.; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationRodger, James G.; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHui, Cang; Stellenbosch Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume12en
local.identifier.doi10.1002/ecs2.3359en
local.identifier.puref8d354d3-7d81-41df-9b75-7eea1fc8e44cen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101859061en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads