Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Rethinking Punk Recording and Production: Elitism, Liveness and the DIY Myth

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Bennett, Samantha

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Porto

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Punk discourse is heavily predicated on DIY aesthetics and, where the production of punk is concerned, the recreation of liveness embodied in cheap, often quickly produced studio recordings (Laing, 1978; Dunn, 2012). Additionally, punk recordings are often positioned as key to the establishment of global networks (Moran, 2010) and at the nexus of the production and dissemination of punk ideologies (Cross, 2010). However, this tendency to define punk in its wider context of DIY cultural production not only results in a dissemination and reception-focused discourse, but also overlooks the realities of the technological, processual and workplace means involved in some of the genre’s most recognisable texts. Based on a chapter to be published in The Oxford Handbook of Punk Rock (Arnold & Mackay, 2020) this paper critiques the notion of DIY in the production of punk and instead sets out: the strong connections between early punk of the late 1960s and early 1970s and classical music-focused recordists; the associated processual intentions based on the capturing of live performance; elite recording studios; and, highly realised technological capacity. Building on previous work on the tech-processual construction of punk aesthetics (Bennett, 2015, 2017), this chapter aims to shift the focus of punk production away from broader discussions surrounding the dissemination of ideological values and towards the sites and personnel key to the production of punk. The work of previously overlooked recordists including Oliver DiCicco, Bill Price, Craig Leon, John Loder, Glenn Lockett and Butch Vig are of particular focus. Finally, this paper elucidates the contradictions and tensions in punk production: the retention of liveness as a core punk recording aesthetic is at odds with its aspiration to constructionist rock music production standards and as such, the resulting sonic aesthetics of punk often undermine the genre’s DIY ideology.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Book of Abstracts: Keep It Simple, Make It Fast! DIY Cultures and Global Challenges

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until