Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Tensile Stress-Strain Properties of Silicone Elastomers Are Not Affected by Specimen Type

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Wang, Kangzheng
Prasetia, Kelvin
Zou, Wenjing
Qin, Yanle
Garcia, Jorge

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

ASTM breast implant standards F703 and F2051 specify that Type C specimens, as described in ASTM D412, must be used to determine the tensile properties of implant shells, whereas ISO breast implant standard 14607 specifies the much smaller Type 2 specimens described in ISO 37. There is ongoing interest in harmonizing these requirements. The published literature on this topic is inconclusive regarding whether specimen size and dimensions affect the stress–strain behavior of polymers and elastomers. Some authors report large effects, requiring careful control of specimen shape and the application of corrections. Others report that the stress–strain behavior is largely independent of specimen geometry. We conducted comparative tensile tests on specimens cut from three 1 mm thick silicone sheets, a smooth breast implant shell, and a textured breast implant shell. Our results show conclusively that, when all other test conditions are the same, ISO 37 Type 2 specimens and ASTM D412 Type C specimens yield equivalent stress–strain behavior of silicone elastomers. However, care must be taken to determine the true engineering strain by measuring the separation of the gauge markers in the center of the narrow portion of the specimens using an extensometer. Failure to do so will lead to erroneous results. We discuss the advantages of using one specimen type over the other.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Testing and Evaluation

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until