Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the Australian Agaristinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on morphology, including a revised checklist of the subfamily

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Wragg, Sharyn
Braby, Michael

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The subfamily Agaristinae from Australia comprise a small group of largely diurnal and brightly coloured moths, but their phylogenetic relationships are largely unknown. Cladistic analysis of nearly all extant genera (20 out of 21, or 95%) and most described species (38 out of 45, or 84%) based on 39 male genitalic and adult morphological characters revealed several incongruencies with the current generic classification. Strict consensus and 50% majority rule analyses confirmed monophyly of the subfamily. The monotypic genus Cremnophora Hampson, 1901 (type species: Apina angasii Walker, 1855, a junior synonym and secondary homonym of Agrista [sic] angasii Angas, 1847) is excluded from the Agaristinae because the morphology of the male genitalia suggest it probably belongs in the Amphipyrinae. Except for a few species-groups, deep level relationships among most clades were largely unresolved. Most genera were monophyletic, but Zalissa Walker, 1865, Leucogonia Hampson, 1908, Argyrolepidia Hampson, 1901 and Idalima Turner, 1903 were all non-monophyletic. Sister-group relationships were recovered between the monotypic genera Apina Walker, 1855 and Agaristodes Hampson, 1908, and between Phalaenoides Lewin, 1805 and Comocrus Jordan, 1896. Morphological and other evidence suggest each of these pairs are congeneric; thus, we propose the following new combinations following synonymy of Agaristodes syn. nov. with Apina and Comocrus syn. nov. with Phalaenoides: Apina feisthamelii (Herrich-Schäffer, [1853]) comb. nov. and Phalaenoides behri (Angas, 1847) comb. nov. Idalima (type species: Agarista affinis Boisduval, 1832) emerged as polyphyletic, with Idalima affinis (Boisduval, 1832) and Idalima metasticta Hampson, 1910 showing a closer relationship to Periscepta Turner, 1920 than to Idalima aethrias (Turner, 1908) or Idalima leonora (Doubleday, 1846). Thus, we synonymise Periscepta syn. nov. with Idalima and transfer Periscepta polysticta (Butler, 1875) and Periscepta butleri (Swinhoe, 1892) to this genus, resulting in the following new combinations: Idalima polysticta (Butler, 1875) comb. nov. and Idalima butleri (Swinhoe, 1892) comb. nov. A revised checklist of the Australian fauna is presented, including nomenclature for all valid subspecies.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Records of the Australian Museum

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

abcd