Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Improved understanding of calibration efficiency, difficulty and parameter uniqueness of conceptual rainfall runoff models using fitness landscape metrics

dc.contributor.authorZhu, S.en
dc.contributor.authorMaier, H. R.en
dc.contributor.authorZecchin, A. C.en
dc.contributor.authorThyer, M. A.en
dc.contributor.authorGuillaume, J. H. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-31T00:29:36Z
dc.date.available2025-05-31T00:29:36Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.description.abstractThe ease and efficiency with which conceptual rainfall runoff (CRR) models can be calibrated, as well as issues related to the uniqueness of their parameters, has received significant attention in literature. While several studies have tried to gain a better understanding of the underlying factors affecting these issues by examining the features of model error surfaces, this has generally been done in an ad-hoc fashion using lower-dimensional representations of higher-dimensional surfaces. In this paper, it is suggested that exploratory landscape analysis (ELA) metrics can be used to quantify key features of the error surfaces of CRR models, including their roughness and flatness, as well as their degree of optima dispersion throughout the surface. This enables key error surface features of CRR models to be compared in a consistent, efficient and easily communicable fashion for models with different combinations of attributes (e.g. model structure, catchment climate conditions, error metrics, and calibration data set lengths). Results from the application of ELA metrics to the error surfaces of 420 CRR models with different combinations of the above attributes indicate that increasing model complexity results in an increase in relative error surface roughness and relative optima dispersion and that, while increasing catchment wetness increases the relative roughness of error surfaces, it also decreases optima dispersion. This suggests that for the models considered in this study, optimisation efficiency is likely to decrease with increasing model complexity and catchment wetness, while optimisation difficulty is likely to increase and parameter uniqueness likely to decrease with model complexity and catchment dryness. While implications for choice of model complexity will need further work, this study highlights the potential value of the proposed approach to understanding the calibration efficiency, difficulty and parameter uniqueness of conceptual rainfall runoff models.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent26en
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694en
dc.identifier.otherWOS:001262022700001en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-6854-8708/work/169818424en
dc.identifier.scopus85197346716en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197346716&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755681
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2024en
dc.sourceJournal of Hydrologyen
dc.subjectConceptual rainfall runoff (CRR) modelsen
dc.subjectError surfaceen
dc.subjectExploratory fitness analysis (ELA) metricsen
dc.subjectModel calibration difficulty and efficiencyen
dc.subjectOptimisationen
dc.subjectParameter uniquenessen
dc.titleImproved understanding of calibration efficiency, difficulty and parameter uniqueness of conceptual rainfall runoff models using fitness landscape metricsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationZhu, S.; University of Adelaideen
local.contributor.affiliationMaier, H. R.; University of Adelaideen
local.contributor.affiliationZecchin, A. C.; University of Adelaideen
local.contributor.affiliationThyer, M. A.; University of Adelaideen
local.contributor.affiliationGuillaume, J. H. A.; Institute for Water Futures, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume639en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131586en
local.identifier.pureff0fc751-345e-4051-b21e-6a9d92001fa9en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85197346716en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads