Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Psychopathology and the Validity of Gastrointestisnal Symptom Reporting as Revealed Through Cluster Analyses of MMPI-2-RF Results

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Lang, Paris A.
Thomas, Linda
Lidbury, Brett A.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Background: Psychological state, self-reported gut symptoms, and somatic complaints are recognized relationships that can impact health assessment and subsequent treatment. Aim: To investigate the impact of psychological state and personality on symptom self-reporting and somatization. Methods: Sixty-two (62) participants from the Hunter region of NSW (Australia) undertook a survey of health and lifestyle along with an MMPI-2-RF assessment of personality, psychopathology, and test-taking attitude. Participants also completed the Rome Criteria to assess functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). To assist the interpretation of MMPI-2-RF results, clustering was applied to identify similar responses and sub-cohort profiles of reporting. Results: Cluster analysis revealed four sub-cohorts, stratified by psychopathology, gut-related symptoms, and the validity of self-reported somatic complaints. Sample clustering identified one sub-cohort defined by high rates of negative affectivity and suicidal ideation. Apart from these differences, clusters were uniform for age, sex, smoking, mental health diagnoses, as well as for gut-related conditions. Conclusion: Results provide further evidence of the interaction of the gut–brain axis and its relationship to serious mental health conditions. It also points to the need to assess the veracity of self-reported symptomatology that may be both pathognomonic for psychopathology but might also be a consequence of gut dysbiosis. Clustering assisted these investigations by defining distinct sub-cohorts based on participant MMPI-2-RF responses.

Description

Citation

Source

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until