NovPhy: A physical reasoning benchmark for open-world AI systems
| dc.contributor.author | Pinto, Vimukthini | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Gamage, Chathura | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Xue, Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Peng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Nikonova, Ekaterina | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Stephenson, Matthew | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Renz, Jochen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-23T08:22:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-23T08:22:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Due to the emergence of AI systems that interact with the physical environment, there is an increased interest in incorporating physical reasoning capabilities into those AI systems. But is it enough to only have physical reasoning capabilities to operate in a real physical environment? In the real world, we constantly face novel situations we have not encountered before. As humans, we are competent at successfully adapting to those situations. Similarly, an agent needs to have the ability to function under the impact of novelties in order to properly operate in an open-world physical environment. To facilitate the development of such AI systems, we propose a new benchmark, NovPhy, that requires an agent to reason about physical scenarios in the presence of novelties and take actions accordingly. The benchmark consists of tasks that require agents to detect and adapt to novelties in physical scenarios. To create tasks in the benchmark, we develop eight novelties representing a diverse novelty space and apply them to five commonly encountered scenarios in a physical environment, related to applying forces and motions such as rolling, falling, and sliding of objects. According to our benchmark design, we evaluate two capabilities of an agent: the performance on a novelty when it is applied to different physical scenarios and the performance on a physical scenario when different novelties are applied to it. We conduct a thorough evaluation with human players, learning agents, and heuristic agents. Our evaluation shows that humans' performance is far beyond the agents' performance. Some agents, even with good normal task performance, perform significantly worse when there is a novelty, and the agents that can adapt to novelties typically adapt slower than humans. We promote the development of intelligent agents capable of performing at the human level or above when operating in open-world physical environments. Benchmark website: https://github.com/phy-q/novphy. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This research was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Army Research Office (ARO) and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-20-2-0002. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the DARPA or ARO, or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. | en |
| dc.description.status | Peer-reviewed | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0004-3702 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | ORCID:/0000-0001-9667-623X/work/184099421 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | ORCID:/0000-0003-3928-2255/work/184101974 | en |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 85201499939 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201499939&partnerID=8YFLogxK | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1885/733751813 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights | Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors | en |
| dc.source | Artificial Intelligence | en |
| dc.subject | AI evaluation | en |
| dc.subject | Novelty adaptation | en |
| dc.subject | Novelty benchmark | en |
| dc.subject | Novelty detection | en |
| dc.subject | Open-world learning | en |
| dc.subject | Physical reasoning | en |
| dc.title | NovPhy: A physical reasoning benchmark for open-world AI systems | en |
| dc.type | Journal article | en |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Pinto, Vimukthini; School of Computing, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National University | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Gamage, Chathura; School of Computing, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National University | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Xue, Cheng; School of Computing, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National University | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Zhang, Peng; School of Computing, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National University | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Nikonova, Ekaterina; Australian National University | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Stephenson, Matthew; Flinders University | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Renz, Jochen; School of Computing, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National University | en |
| local.identifier.citationvolume | 336 | en |
| local.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.artint.2024.104198 | en |
| local.identifier.pure | 8f8d00f6-c5ab-4c88-b05f-335d0781003b | en |
| local.identifier.url | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85201499939 | en |
| local.type.status | Published | en |