Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

An integrated approach for multi-year irrigation benchmarking using satellites, surveys and on-farm measured data

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Gao, Zitian
Guo, Danlu
Ryu, Dongryeol
Western, Andrew W.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Benchmarking is an effective management tool to improve irrigation performance through comparison with other irrigation management units; however, its application is often limited by the data available to support the analysis. This study developed a benchmarking system that reduces reliance on local data by using satellite-based estimates and quantifies benchmarking uncertainty due to alternative data sources. We benchmarked the relative irrigation supply (RISsatellite) (i.e. the ratio of irrigation supply to crop net irrigation demand) for more than 300 farms growing corn/maize, cotton and rice crops in the Coleambally Irrigation Area in Australia from 2011 to 2019. Three key inputs to RISsatellite, namely irrigated cropping area (ICA), start and end dates of a season (SOS/EOS) and crop coefficient (Kc), were derived from Landsat time series data. To understand the uncertainty in satellite-based benchmarking, RISsatellite was compared with RISnon-satellite estimates derived from non-satellite datasets. The variation in RIS with respect to input data sources and the reliability of data sources were also quantified. RISsatellite was highly variable across farms in any particular year, and over-irrigation (RISsatellite>1) was common. In addition, each farm tended to have a consistent RISsatellite ranking across years, indicating the role of farmers’ irrigation management practice in RIS. ICA from different datasets contributed most to the random variation in RIS, while satellite-based ICA presented more reliable estimates with a median absolute percentage error of 5 %, which is half the error for survey-based ICA. We conclude that our satellite-based benchmarking system is effective in overcoming data limitations and is likely to be more reliable than systems using survey data. This system can support improved irrigation performance monitoring in this district and is transferable to other irrigation areas with irrigation supply information available.

Description

Citation

Source

Agricultural Water Management

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd