Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A morphometric analysis of eucalyptus urophylla and related taxawith descriptions of two new species

dc.contributor.authorPryor, L. D.en
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, E. R.en
dc.contributor.authorGunn, B. V.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-07T15:41:18Z
dc.date.available2026-01-07T15:41:18Z
dc.date.issued1995en
dc.description.abstractOver 400 specimens from 26 locations, mainly in the Lesser Sunda Islands and some from New Guinea and northern Cape York, were examined. These were representative of an array of forms ordinarilyassigned to Eucalyptus urophylla, E. pellita and an undescribed species as well as those considered bysome to be hybrid between E. alba and E. urophylla. The latter has long been considered to showconsiderable polymorphism. Re-examination of the available material and records suggest thatinterspecific hybridisation is not significantly involved in this variability. Although this examinationpointed to the existence of some differentiation at the level of species in this array, there was still a coreof material which could not be separated readily into subgroups. Measurements were taken of selectedfloral and foliar morphological features which were then subject to statistical analysis to ascertain ifsubgroups were discernible on this basis. As a result, the separation of two species, Eucalyptus orophilasp. nov. and Eucalyptus wetarensis sp. nov. from Eucalyptus urophylla sensu lato in the Lesser Sunda Islands, is supported. The related populations called species A by Pinyopusarerk et al. (1993), fromNew Guinea and northern Cape York, were to a somewhat lesser extent separated on these criteria.These results were paralleled by evidence from seedling morphology and oil characteristics. Isozymeanalysis gave a similar grouping for the material from Wetar, but did not indicate other separations fromthe core E. urophylla.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was stimulated by the addition to older collections of an extensive suite of material collected during exploration and seed collection on the islands of Alor, Pantar and Wetar in Indonesia in a joint effort by staff of the Agency for Forestry Research and Development of the Indonesia Forestry Department, P.T. Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Corporation and the Australian Tree Seed Centre of CSIRO, Division of Forestry, Australia. The programme was supported by the Australian International Development Assistance Bureau (A1DAB)-funded Seeds of Australian Trees Project. Christian Cossalter generously arranged to lend for perusal specimens from Siroeng volcano in Pantar held by the Centre de CoopCration Internationale en Recherche Agronomic pour le DCveloppement (CIRAD), formerly Centre Technique Forestier Tropical (CTFT) at Nogent-sur-Mame, France. We are grateful to Ian Brooker for the Latin diagnoses. Much appreciated technical assistance was provided by Katie Semple and Segun Osunkaya. We thank Janet Thomson for preparing the diagrams and Eva Morrow for word processing.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent14en
dc.identifier.issn1030-1887en
dc.identifier.scopus0002087498en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733803981
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceAustralian Systematic Botanyen
dc.titleA morphometric analysis of eucalyptus urophylla and related taxawith descriptions of two new speciesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage70en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage57en
local.contributor.affiliationPryor, L. D.; CSIROen
local.contributor.affiliationWilliams, E. R.; CSIROen
local.contributor.affiliationGunn, B. V.; CSIROen
local.identifier.citationvolume8en
local.identifier.doi10.1071/SB9950057en
local.identifier.puredba8e6b8-1891-4e34-acc1-fdca300e477cen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0002087498en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads