Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A social safety net for the impact of technical change : an evaluation of the Myers Committee's adjustment assistance proposal / J.H. Cassing and A.L. Hillman.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Cassing, James H.
Hillman, Arye L.
Australian National University. Centre for Economic Policy Research

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Canberra : Centre for Economic Policy Research, Australian National University

Access Statement

Open Access

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper assesses the "social safety net" proposal by the Myer's Committee Report on Technological Change as a program aimed to ameliorate the losses of individuals adversely affected by technical progress. The point is made that while the safety net is geared toward retrenched employees moving through the unemployment pool, much of the actual loss from unanticipated technical progress is taken as written down capital values by immobile factor owners tied to the old technology. In the end, the safety net amounts to little more than increased unemployment benefits which do not compensate many of the injured parties. Some of the arguments for treating certain factor owners asymmetrically are scrutinized and the experiences of Australia and the United States with Committee Report on Technological Change as a program aimed to ameliorate the losses of individuals adversely affected by technical progress. The point is made that while the safety net is geared toward retrenched employees moving through the unemployment pool, much of the actual loss from unanticipated technical progress is taken as written down capital values by immobile factor owners tied to the old technology. In the end, the safety net amounts to little more than increased unemployment benefits which do not compensate many of the injured parties. Some of the arguments for treating certain factor owners asymmetrically are scrutinized and the experiences of Australia and the United States with similar trade adjustment assistance schemes are recounted.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

ANU Publications Digitisation Project

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description