Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Energy, exergy and economic evaluation comparison of small-scale single and dual pressure organic Rankine cycles integrated with low-grade heat sources

dc.contributor.authorFontalvo, Armandoen
dc.contributor.authorSolano, Joseen
dc.contributor.authorPedraza, Cristianen
dc.contributor.authorBula, Antonioen
dc.contributor.authorQuiroga, Arturo Gonzalezen
dc.contributor.authorPadilla, Ricardo Vasquezen
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-11T08:43:44Z
dc.date.available2026-06-11T08:43:44Z
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.description.abstractLow-grade heat sources such as solar thermal, geothermal, exhaust gases and industrial waste heat are suitable alternatives for power generation which can be exploited by means of small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). This paper combines thermodynamic optimization and economic analysis to assess the performance of single and dual pressure ORC operating with different organic fluids and targeting small-scale applications. Maximum power output is lower than 45 KW while the temperature of the heat source varies in the range 100-200 °C. The studied working fluids, namely R1234yf, R1234ze(E) and R1234ze(Z), are selected based on environmental, safety and thermal performance criteria. Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) and Specific Investment Cost (SIC) for two operation conditions are presented: maximum power output and maximum thermal efficiency. Results showed that R1234ze(Z) achieves the highest net power output (up to 44 kW) when net power output is optimized. Regenerative ORC achieves the highest performance when thermal efficiency is optimized (up to 18%). Simple ORC is the most cost-effective among the studied cycle configurations, requiring a selling price of energy of 0.3 USD/kWh to obtain a payback period of 8 years. According to SIC results, the working fluid R1234ze(Z) exhibits great potential for simple ORC when compared to conventional R245fa.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.issn1099-4300en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-3445-1649/work/217152150en
dc.identifier.scopus85030101620en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733810692
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2017 by the authors.en
dc.sourceEntropyen
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen
dc.subjectExergy analysisen
dc.subjectLow grade heaten
dc.subjectOrganic rankine cycleen
dc.subjectR1234ze(Z)en
dc.subjectSmall scale poweren
dc.subjectThermodynamic optimizationen
dc.titleEnergy, exergy and economic evaluation comparison of small-scale single and dual pressure organic Rankine cycles integrated with low-grade heat sourcesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationFontalvo, Armando; Department of Energyen
local.contributor.affiliationSolano, Jose; Universidad del Norteen
local.contributor.affiliationPedraza, Cristian; Universidad del Atlánticoen
local.contributor.affiliationBula, Antonio; Universidad del Norteen
local.contributor.affiliationQuiroga, Arturo Gonzalez; Universidad del Norteen
local.contributor.affiliationPadilla, Ricardo Vasquez; Southern Cross Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume19en
local.identifier.doi10.3390/e19100476en
local.identifier.purec0a9fc0e-9c57-40d4-ad21-46a3a28de82ben
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85030101620en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads