Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

HDDL– A Language to Describe Hierarchical Planning Problems

dc.contributor.authorHöller, Danielen
dc.contributor.authorBehnke, Gregoren
dc.contributor.authorBercher, Pascalen
dc.contributor.authorBiundo, Susanneen
dc.contributor.authorFiorino, Humberten
dc.contributor.authorPellier, Damienen
dc.contributor.authorAlford, Ronen
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-17T20:42:02Z
dc.date.available2026-06-17T20:42:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-11en
dc.description.abstractThe research in hierarchical planning has made considerable progress in the last few years. Many recent systems do not rely on hand-tailored advice anymore to find solutions, but are supposed to be domain-independent systems that come with sophisticated solving techniques. In principle, this development would make the comparison between systems easier (because the domains are not tailored to a single system anymore) and – much more important – also the integration into other systems, because the modeling process is less tedious (due to the lack of advice) and there is no (or less) commitment to a certain planning system the model is created for. However, these advantages are destroyed by the lack of a common input language and feature set supported by the different systems. In this paper, we propose an extension to PDDL, the description language used in non-hierarchical planning, to the needs of hierarchical planning systems. We restrict our language to a basic feature set shared by many recent systems, give an extension of PDDL’s EBNF syntax definition, and discuss our extensions, especially with respect to planner-specific input languages from related work.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent9en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-0795-4320/work/217693527en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733811525
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2nd ICAPS Workshop on Hierarchical Planningen
dc.titleHDDL– A Language to Describe Hierarchical Planning Problemsen
dc.typeConference paperen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage14en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage6en
local.contributor.affiliationHöller, Daniel; Ulm Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBehnke, Gregor; Ulm Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBercher, Pascal; Ulm Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBiundo, Susanne; Ulm Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationFiorino, Humbert; University Grenoble Alpesen
local.contributor.affiliationPellier, Damien; University of Grenoble Alpesen
local.contributor.affiliationAlford, Ron; MITRE Corporationen
local.identifier.pure9ef7c307-07ce-48cf-aab7-a23ac4a9f127en
local.identifier.urlhttps://icaps19.icaps-conference.org/workshops/Hierarchical-Planning/en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads