Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Regional changes of climate extremes over Australia - A comparison of regional dynamical downscaling and global climate model simulations

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Perkins, Sarah E.
Moise, Aurel
Whetton, Penny
Katzfey, Jack

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Dynamically downscaled simulations are an attractive source of information for those requiring greater regional detail than what Global Climate Models (GCMs) can provide. However, an important question is whether the information derived from downscaled simulations is plausible. Some recent studies have attempted to answer this question using an 'added value' framework. This study takes an alternate approach by comparing projected changes of climate extremes from Regionally Dynamically Downscaled Model (RDM) ensembles to the host GCM ensemble over the Australian continent. Bias-corrected sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) from five Coupled Model Inter-comparison Program Phase 3 (CMIP3) GCMs are used to force two different configurations of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Conformal Cubic Atmosphere Model (CCAM), run at 60 km. For each member of the two CCAM ensembles and each GCM ensemble member, a selection of extreme events and their changes were calculated for minimum temperature, maximum temperature and precipitation for the climate of the 20th century (20c3m; 1980-1999) and A2 (2081-2100) simulations. We find that CCAM shows finer spatial detail in the current distribution of extremes and also the projected climate change signal than GCMs. While the projected change in extreme temperatures has a similar pattern in CCAM compared to the host GCMs, the projected changes in rainfall are not only more spatially detailed but also different at the large scale. This, however, does not infer that climate change signal in CCAM is necessarily more or less physically plausible than the GCMs. In order to ascertain the plausibility and usefulness of RDM simulations, we strongly encourage a critical assessment of the required simulations before their use in adaptation and impacts planning, which includes a comparison to similar simulations from the host GCM(s).

Description

Citation

Source

International Journal of Climatology

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until