Order of amino acid recruitment into the genetic code resolved by last universal common ancestor’s protein domains

Abstract

The current “consensus” order in which amino acids were added to the genetic code is based on potentially biased criteria, such as the absence of sulfur-containing amino acids from the Urey–Miller experiment which lacked sulfur. More broadly, abiotic abundance might not reflect biotic abundance in the organisms in which the genetic code evolved. Here, we instead identify which protein domains date to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) and then infer the order of recruitment from deviations of their ancestrally reconstructed amino acid frequencies from the still-ancient post-LUCA controls. We find that smaller amino acids were added to the code earlier, with no additional predictive power in the previous consensus order. Metal-binding (cysteine and histidine) and sulfur-containing (cysteine and methionine) amino acids were added to the genetic code much earlier than previously thought. Methionine and histidine were added to the code earlier than expected from their molecular weights and glutamine later. Early methionine availability is compatible with inferred early use of S-adenosylmethionine and early histidine with its purine-like structure and the demand for metal binding. Even more ancient protein sequences—those that had already diversified into multiple distinct copies prior to LUCA—have significantly higher frequencies of aromatic amino acids (tryptophan, tyrosine, phenylalanine, and histidine) and lower frequencies of valine and glutamic acid than single-copy LUCA sequences. If at least some of these sequences predate the current code, then their distinct enrichment patterns provide hints about earlier, alternative genetic codes. Show more