Institutional fragmentation of peat fire management in Indonesia: A knowledge management perspective

dc.contributor.authorRochmayanto, Yantoen
dc.contributor.authorSakuntaladewi, Nikenen
dc.contributor.authorIqbal, M.en
dc.contributor.authorHidayat, D. C.en
dc.contributor.authorWinarno, Bondanen
dc.contributor.authorLestari, Srien
dc.contributor.authorQirom, M. A.en
dc.contributor.authorArdhana, A.en
dc.contributor.authorVan Kerkhoff, L.en
dc.contributor.authorRobins, L.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-12T11:40:54Z
dc.date.available2026-02-12T11:40:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-26en
dc.description.abstractThe importance of intersectoral collaboration in policy implementation has been widely accepted. Concepts of intersectoral collaboration and policy coordination are theoretically appealing; however, it is challenging to implement in practice, including in forest fire management. This paper aims to map the institutions on forest fire management and analyze the rationality in using knowledge in their duties and authorities. Using stakeholder mapping combined with the Concern-Knowledge-Action approach, this study is conducted at the national level in Indonesia, and takes two sub-national levels, South Sumatera and Central Kalimantan, as the case study. There are many institutions involved in fire management in all governance levels, including at the provincial-district level, as well as at the sub-district-village level, but the institutional fragmentation in peat fire management is still found. In managing fire in South Sumatera and Central Kalimantan, it is not handled by a specific institution having the most influential and important positions. They have different authorities but the same potential power to prevent and combat fire. A complex interconnection among them indicates the need for effective institution integration. Less connectivity among the knowledge pool is also found, especially between private - community, NGO - academia, and government - community. Finally, knowledge improvement on fire prevention method especially in defining a community livelihood offset, as well as the ex-post fire management (measuring the level of fire impact and its recovery methods) is needed to fill the gap of knowledge. A stakeholder Forum is one of the options to improve intersectoral coordination in managing forest fire in peatland and enhance the effectiveness of knowledge sharing. At community level, conducting informal discussion and capacity-building programs would be feasible options for better coordination and improving knowledge.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author would like to thank ACIAR Project FST/2016/144 for having provided financial support to this research and to participate in INAFOR Conference 2021.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent28en
dc.identifier.issn1755-1307en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-3838-9536/work/205114777en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-0247-1511/work/205116904en
dc.identifier.scopus85120566681en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733805455
dc.language.isoenen
dc.provenanceContent from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofseries6th International Conference of Indonesia Forestry Researchers - Stream 4: Engaging Social Economic of Environment and Forestry, Better Social Welfare, INAFOR 2021 Stream 4en
dc.rights© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.en
dc.sourceIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Scienceen
dc.titleInstitutional fragmentation of peat fire management in Indonesia: A knowledge management perspectiveen
dc.typeConference paperen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage28en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en
local.contributor.affiliationRochmayanto, Yanto; Center for Research and Development on Social, Economy, Policy, and Climate Change, The Ministry of Environment and Forestryen
local.contributor.affiliationSakuntaladewi, Niken; Center for Research and Development on Social, Economy, Policy, and Climate Change, The Ministry of Environment and Forestryen
local.contributor.affiliationIqbal, M.; Center for Research and Development on Social, Economy, Policy, and Climate Change, The Ministry of Environment and Forestryen
local.contributor.affiliationHidayat, D. C.; Center for Research and Development on Social, Economy, Policy, and Climate Change, The Ministry of Environment and Forestryen
local.contributor.affiliationWinarno, Bondan; Forest Research and Development Center, The Ministry of Environment and Forestryen
local.contributor.affiliationLestari, Sri; Forest Research and Development Center, The Ministry of Environment and Forestryen
local.contributor.affiliationQirom, M. A.; Banjarbaru Environment and Forestry Research Development Instituteen
local.contributor.affiliationArdhana, A.; Banjarbaru Environment and Forestry Research Development Instituteen
local.contributor.affiliationVan Kerkhoff, L.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationRobins, L.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB24123en
local.identifier.citationvolume917en
local.identifier.doi10.1088/1755-1315/917/1/012028en
local.identifier.pure28c480ed-9e9b-4c55-9986-10873a4b260ben
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85120566681en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
conference paper.pdf
Size:
915.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format