A low prostate specific antigen predicts a worse outcome in high but not in low/intermediate-grade prostate cancer

dc.contributor.authorFankhauser, Christian D.en
dc.contributor.authorParry, Matthew G.en
dc.contributor.authorAli, Adnanen
dc.contributor.authorCowling, Thomas E.en
dc.contributor.authorNossiter, Julieen
dc.contributor.authorSujenthiran, Arunen
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Brendanen
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Melanieen
dc.contributor.authorAggarwal, Ajayen
dc.contributor.authorPayne, Heatheren
dc.contributor.authorvan der Meulen, Janen
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Noel W.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T20:31:04Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T20:31:04Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.description.abstractObjective: The relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate cancer (PCa) grade was traditionally thought to be linear but recent reports suggest this is not true in high-grade cancers. We aimed to compare the association between PSA and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) in clinically localised low/intermediate and high-grade PCa. Subjects/patients and methods: Retrospective cohort study using the National Prostate Cancer Audit database in England of men treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), EBRT and brachytherapy boost (EBRT + BT), radical prostatectomy or no radical local treatment between 2014 and 2018. Multivariable competing-risk regression was used to examine the association between PSA, Gleason, and PCSM. Multivariable restricted cubic spline regression was used to explore the non-linear associations of PSA and PCSM. Results: 102,089 men were included, of whom 71,138 had low/intermediate-grade and 22,425 had high-grade PCa. In high-grade, 4-year PCSM was higher with PSA ≤5 than PSA 5.1–10 for men treated with EBRT (hazard ratio 1.96 (95% confidence interval 1.15–3.34) or no radical local treatment (hazard ratio 1.99 (95% confidence interval 1.33–2.98). Restricted cubic spline regression showed that PSA and PCSM have a non-linear association in high-grade but a linear association in low/intermediate-grade PCa. Conclusion: The low-PSA/high-grade combination in M0 PCa treated with EBRT has a higher PCSM than those with high-grade and intermediate PSA levels. In high-grade disease, the PSA association was non-linear; by contrast, low/intermediate-grade had a linear relationship. This confirms a more aggressive biology in low PSA secreting high-grade PCa and a worse outcome following treatment.en
dc.description.sponsorshipM.G.P. was supported by the National Institute of Health Research (DRF-2018-11-ST2-036). The National Prostate Cancer Audit is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) as part of the National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme, and funded by NHS England and the Welsh Government . Neither the funders nor HQIP had any involvement in the study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, in the writing of this report. T.E.C was supported by the Medical Research Council (grant number MR/S020470/1). C.D.F. was supported by the Walter und Gertrud Siegenthaler Stiftung.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent9en
dc.identifier.issn0959-8049en
dc.identifier.otherPubMed:36641896en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-8344-3776/work/167893665en
dc.identifier.scopus85146167289en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146167289&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755422
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)en
dc.sourceEuropean Journal of Canceren
dc.subjectAndrogen deprivation therapyen
dc.subjectBrachytherapyen
dc.subjectProstate canceren
dc.subjectProstate-specific antigenen
dc.subjectProstatectomyen
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen
dc.titleA low prostate specific antigen predicts a worse outcome in high but not in low/intermediate-grade prostate canceren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage78en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage70en
local.contributor.affiliationFankhauser, Christian D.; The Christie NHS Foundation Trusten
local.contributor.affiliationParry, Matthew G.; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationAli, Adnan; Genome Sciences and Cancer Division, John Curtin School of Medical Research, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationCowling, Thomas E.; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationNossiter, Julie; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationSujenthiran, Arun; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationBerry, Brendan; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationMorris, Melanie; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationAggarwal, Ajay; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationPayne, Heather; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationvan der Meulen, Jan; The Royal College of Surgeons of Englanden
local.contributor.affiliationClarke, Noel W.; The Christie NHS Foundation Trusten
local.identifier.citationvolume181en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.017en
local.identifier.pureb85692a3-0534-440c-bbd6-b980d4c859c1en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85146167289en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads