Open Research will be unavailable from 10.15am - 11am on Saturday 14th March 2026 AEDT due to scheduled maintenance.
 

Local earthquakes detection: A benchmark dataset of 3-component seismograms built on a global scale

dc.contributor.authorMagrini, Fabrizioen
dc.contributor.authorJozinović, Darioen
dc.contributor.authorCammarano, Fabioen
dc.contributor.authorMichelini, Albertoen
dc.contributor.authorBoschi, Lapoen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T15:30:56Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T15:30:56Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.description.abstractMachine learning is becoming increasingly important in scientific and technological progress, due to its ability to create models that describe complex data and generalize well. The wealth of publicly-available seismic data nowadays requires automated, fast, and reliable tools to carry out a multitude of tasks, such as the detection of small, local earthquakes in areas characterized by sparsity of receivers. A similar application of machine learning, however, should be built on a large amount of labeled seismograms, which is neither immediate to obtain nor to compile. In this study we present a large dataset of seismograms recorded along the vertical, north, and east components of 1487 broad-band or very broad-band receivers distributed worldwide; this includes 629,095 3-component seismograms generated by 304,878 local earthquakes and labeled as EQ, and 615,847 ones labeled as noise (AN). Application of machine learning to this dataset shows that a simple Convolutional Neural Network of 67,939 parameters allows discriminating between earthquakes and noise single-station recordings, even if applied in regions not represented in the training set. Achieving an accuracy of 96.7, 95.3, and 93.2% on training, validation, and test set, respectively, we prove that the large variety of geological and tectonic settings covered by our data supports the generalization capabilities of the algorithm, and makes it applicable to real-time detection of local events. We make the database publicly available, intending to provide the seismological and broader scientific community with a benchmark for time-series to be used as a testing ground in signal processing.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCatalogues of seismic events were downloaded from Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) Seismological Data Centre (2006) , International Seismological Centre (2019) ( Storchak et al., 2013 , 2015 ; Giacomo et al., 2018 ), and IRIS Data Services (0000). The facilities of IRIS Data Services , and specifically the IRIS Data Management Center, were used for access to waveforms, related metadata, and/or derived products used in this study. IRIS Data Services are funded through the Seismological Facilities for the Advancement of Geoscience and EarthScope (SAGE) Proposal of the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement EAR-1261681. Seismic waveforms have been downloaded using EIDA archive ( http://www.orfeus-eu.org/eida ) from the following network operators: Arizona Geological Survey (2007) , Penn State University: AfricaArray (2004) , Alaska Earthquake Center (1987) , Swiss Seismological Service (SED) at ETH Zurich (1983) , California Institute of Technology and United States Geological Survey Pasadena (1926) , Geological Survey of Canada (1980) , Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (1973) , RESIF - Réseau Sismologique et géodésique Français (1995) , Institut De Physique Du Globe De Paris (IPGP) & Ecole Et Observatoire Des Sciences De La Terre De Strasbourg (EOST) (1982) , GEOFON Data Centre (1993) , Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) (1976) , Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory (ASL)/USGS (1988, 1990, 1992, 1993) , The Finnish National Seismic Network. GFZ Data Services (1980) , Scripps Institution of Oceanography (1986) , Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) Seismological Data Centre (2006) , Kyrgyz Institute of Seismology, KIS (2007) , MedNet Project Partner Institutions (1990) , UC San Diego: Central and Eastern US Network (2013) , ZAMG - Zentralanstalt für Meterologie und Geodynamik (1987) , Oklahoma Geological Survey: Oklahoma Seismic Network (1978) , Penn State University: Pennsylvania State Seismic Network (2004) , University Of Montana: University of Montana Seismic Network (2017) , International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks: XV Seismic Network (2014) ( Tape and West, 2014 ; Tape et al., 2018 ). We are grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive reviews. We thank the makers of Obspy (Beyreuther et al. 2010). Graphics were created with Python Matplotlib (Hunter, 2007). The Grant to Department of Science, Roma Tre University (MIUR-Italy Dipartimenti di Eccellenza, ARTICOLO 1, COMMI 314 - 337 LEGGE 232/2016) is gratefully acknowledged.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent10en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-2417-2686/work/171156794en
dc.identifier.scopus85108273121en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108273121&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755143
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)en
dc.sourceArtificial Intelligence in Geosciencesen
dc.subjectBenchmark dataseten
dc.subjectEarthquake detection algorithmen
dc.subjectSeismologyen
dc.subjectSupervised machine learningen
dc.titleLocal earthquakes detection: A benchmark dataset of 3-component seismograms built on a global scaleen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage10en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en
local.contributor.affiliationMagrini, Fabrizio; Geophysics, Research School of Earth Sciences, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationJozinović, Dario; Roma Tre Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationCammarano, Fabio; Roma Tre Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMichelini, Alberto; Istituto Nazionale Di Geofisica E Vulcanologiaen
local.contributor.affiliationBoschi, Lapo; University of Paduaen
local.identifier.citationvolume1en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aiig.2020.04.001en
local.identifier.pure781f5ae5-03f7-431c-8dd0-8f13f018048ben
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85108273121en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads