Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Institutes for Propaganda Analysis and Frankfurt School Social Research on Morningside Heights: A de facto Alliance and Its Legacies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Jones, Paul K.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The relationship between the Institute for Propaganda Analysis (IPA) and the exiled Frankfurt School’s Institute for Social Research (FISR) is somewhat enigmatic, despite the two entities’ physical proximity on Morningside Heights during the 1930s and 1940s. This article challenges J. Michael Sproule’s “mutual disinterest” account of that relationship. It demonstrates the influence of Alfred and Elizabeth Lee on the FISR’s Studies in Prejudice project, which anticipated a scenario in the US like the democratic crisis that exists today. Theodor Adorno’s work on demagogic propaganda is particularly indebted to the Lees’ The Fine Art of Propaganda: A Study of Father Coughlin’s Speeches (1939). Detailed archival and textual reconstruction of this relationship is presented. This focuses on the FISR’s plans for a popular manual like The Fine Art and Adorno’s reworking of the IPA’s famous “seven devices” of propaganda technique into a more elaborate theoretical and practical counterdemagogic program. This article also demonstrates that these developments in propaganda studies played a little-recognized role in the wellknown tension between Adorno and Paul Lazarsfeld regarding “administrative” and “critical” communications research. Finally, the legacies of this complex history are briefly explored in the context of current debates about research on disinformation.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journalism history

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd