Redefining the role of the practitioner in critical systems methodologies

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKay, Roberten
dc.contributor.authorHalpin, Darrenen
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-01T09:41:53Z
dc.date.available2026-01-01T09:41:53Z
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we suggest that recent approaches to dealing with complexity within the systems paradigm fail to deal adequately with the influence of the practitioner in the execution of a methodological inquiry. This will be explored through a brief critique of Total Systems Intervention (TSI). In constructing our argument we will identify the practitioner, the situation under study and the theory informing the practitioner as the three components of methodology construction.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent9en
dc.identifier.issn1092-7026en
dc.identifier.scopus0033243414en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733799624
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceSystems Research and Behavioral Scienceen
dc.subjectCritical systems methodologiesen
dc.subjectMethodology constructionen
dc.subjectPractitioneren
dc.subjectSystems practiceen
dc.titleRedefining the role of the practitioner in critical systems methodologiesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage281en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage273en
local.contributor.affiliationKay, Robert; Western Sydney Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHalpin, Darren; Centre for Systemic Developmenten
local.identifier.citationvolume16en
local.identifier.doi10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199905/06)16:3<273::AID-SRES231>3.0.CO;2-Cen
local.identifier.pure84d66d0a-b187-4bdd-92bc-daf51393201cen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033243414en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

Collections

ANU Research Publications

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS