Evidence of back-folding in the Beas Valley puts Himalayan tectonic models on trial

dc.contributor.authorOjha, Arun Kumaren
dc.contributor.authorSrivastava, Deepaken
dc.contributor.authorForster, Marnieen
dc.contributor.authorLister, Gordonen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T14:21:27Z
dc.date.available2025-05-23T14:21:27Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.description.abstractField structural observations from the Himachal Himalaya, in the northwest of the mountain belt, challenge existing tectonic models and raise questions as to their validity. Microstructures and geochronological data reveal two discrete episodes of Barrovian metamorphism, the earliest during the Eocene-Oligocene transition, before an early period of recumbent folding. This metamorphic event occurred in association with a km-scale extensional ductile shear zone that is itself now recumbently folded on the km-scale, with an axial plane pressure solution cleavage. The Eocene-Oligocene gneiss complex is thus exposed in its core. The second episode of Barrovian metamorphism occurred in association with another regional-scale extensional shear zone during the Oligo-Miocene transition, thus synchronous to the South Tibetan Detachment System. This transects the recumbent fold stack. Microstructures show that the Main Central Thrust was initiated after the second phase of extension, and the associated second episode of Barrovian metamorphism had ceased operating. Further, the previously unrecognized km-scale Phojal Back-fold affects all of the above structures. Confusion caused by the misidentification of this structure led to the tectonic-wedge model, but this hypothesis can be invalidated by the structural evidence presented here. Our data support an alternative hypothesis that requires tectonic mode-switches in association with a succession of accretion events as India indents into Eurasia.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Peter Molnar, Paul Tapponnier, and Prof. An Yin. Their work continues to inspire researchers in the field. AKO acknowledges the Start-up Research Grant (File No. SRG/2022/001845) from the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India for the support to carry out the research work. AKO acknowledges the Director, CSIR-NGRI, for the help and encouragement in publishing this work as CSIR-NGRI contribution No. NGRI/Lib/2024/Pub-73. The authors acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive review and suggestions and also appreciate Prof. Ian Alsop for his editorial handling.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.issn0191-8141en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-1240-4374/work/184099996en
dc.identifier.scopus85199679024en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199679024&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733752422
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltden
dc.sourceJournal of Structural Geologyen
dc.subjectBack-folden
dc.subjectHimalayaen
dc.subjectPhojal folden
dc.subjectRecumbent folden
dc.subjectSouth Tibetan Detachmenten
dc.titleEvidence of back-folding in the Beas Valley puts Himalayan tectonic models on trialen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationOjha, Arun Kumar; CSIR - National Geophysical Research Instituteen
local.contributor.affiliationSrivastava, Deepak; Indian Institute of Technology Roorkeeen
local.contributor.affiliationForster, Marnie; Geochemistry, Research School of Earth Sciences, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationLister, Gordon; University of Queenslanden
local.identifier.citationvolume186en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105217en
local.identifier.pure0d283c17-eceb-479d-8775-2836210cdb4cen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199679024en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads