Open Research will be unavailable from 10.15am - 11am on Saturday 14th March 2026 AEDT due to scheduled maintenance.
 

Interventions to promote cost-effectiveness in adult intensive care units: consensus statement and considerations for best practice from a multidisciplinary and multinational eDelphi study

dc.contributor.author Kansal, Amit en
dc.contributor.authorM. Latour, Jos en
dc.contributor.author Choong See, Kay en
dc.contributor.authorRai, Sumeeten
dc.contributor.author Cecconi, Maurizio en
dc.contributor.author Britto, Carl en
dc.contributor.author Conway Morris, Andrew en
dc.contributor.authorDominic Savio, Raymond en
dc.contributor.authorVinay , M. Nadkarnien
dc.contributor.authorB. K. Rao, B. K. Raoen
dc.contributor.author Mishra, Rajesh en
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-31T04:28:33Z
dc.date.available2025-05-31T04:28:33Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.description.abstractBackground There is limited evidence to guide interventions that promote cost-effectiveness in adult intensive care units (ICU). The aim of this consensus statement is to identify globally applicable interventions for best ICU practice and provide guidance for judicious use of resources. Methods A three-round modified online Delphi process, using a web-based platform, sought consensus from 61 multidisciplinary ICU experts (physicians, nurses, allied health, administrators) from 21 countries. Round 1 was qualitative to ascertain opinions on cost-effectiveness criteria based on four key domains of high-value healthcare (foundational elements; infrastructure fundamentals; care delivery priorities; reliability and feedback). Round 2 was qualitative and quantitative, while round 3 was quantitative to reiterate and establish criteria. Both rounds 2 and 3 utilized a five-point Likert scale for voting. Consensus was considered when > 70% of the experts voted for a proposed intervention. Thereafter, the steering committee endorsed interventions that were identified as ‘critical’ by more than 50% of steering committee members. These interventions and experts’ comments were summarized as final considerations for best practice. Results At the conclusion of round 3, consensus was obtained on 50 best practice considerations for cost-effectiveness in adult ICU. Finally, the steering committee endorsed 9 ‘critical’ best practice considerations. This included adoption of a multidisciplinary ICU model of care, focus on staff training and competency assessment, ongoing quality audits, thus ensuring high quality of critical care services whether within or outside the four walls of ICUs, implementation of a dynamic staff roster, multidisciplinary approach to implementing end-of-life care, early mobilization and promoting international consensus efforts on the Green ICU concept. Conclusions This Delphi study with international experts resulted in 9 consensus statements and best practice considerations promoting cost-effectiveness in adult ICUs. Stakeholders (government bodies, professional societies) must lead the efforts to identify locally applicable specifics while working within these best practice considerations with the available resources.en
dc.description.sponsorshipACM is funded by the UK Medical Research Council via a Clinician Scientist Fellowship (MR/V006118/1).en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent12en
dc.identifier.issn1364-8535en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-6996-2449/work/197241959en
dc.identifier.scopus85179177973en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755991
dc.language.isoenen
dc.provenanceThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s)en
dc.sourceCritical Careen
dc.titleInterventions to promote cost-effectiveness in adult intensive care units: consensus statement and considerations for best practice from a multidisciplinary and multinational eDelphi studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliation Kansal, Amit ; National University Health Systemen
local.contributor.affiliationM. Latour, Jos ; University of Plymouthen
local.contributor.affiliation Choong See, Kay ; National University Hospitalen
local.contributor.affiliationRai, Sumeet; School of Medicine and Psychology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliation Cecconi, Maurizio ; Humanitas University en
local.contributor.affiliation Britto, Carl ; Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiaen
local.contributor.affiliation Conway Morris, Andrew ; University of Cambridgeen
local.contributor.affiliationDominic Savio, Raymond ; Critical Care Services, Apollo Proton Cancer Centeren
local.contributor.affiliationVinay , M. Nadkarni; University of Pennsylvaniaen
local.contributor.affiliationB. K. Rao, B. K. Rao; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospitalen
local.contributor.affiliation Mishra, Rajesh ; Shaibya Comprehensive Care Clinicen
local.identifier.citationvolume27en
local.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-023-04766-2en
local.identifier.pure6150166c-bc59-42cf-a006-5f2c1fdf3846en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85179177973en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s13054-023-04766-2_3_.pdf
Size:
963.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format