Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

On the social cost of carbon and discounting in the DICE model

dc.contributor.authorBraun, Philippen
dc.contributor.authorFaulwasser, Timmen
dc.contributor.authorGrüne, Larsen
dc.contributor.authorKellett, Christopher M.en
dc.contributor.authorSemmler, Willien
dc.contributor.authorWeller, Steven R.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-11T08:43:22Z
dc.date.available2026-06-11T08:43:22Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.description.abstractThe social cost of carbon (SCC) has emerged as one of the relevant measures in integrated assessment models in climate economics, to quantify costs related to global warming and climate change. While the SCC is used in different models, including DICE (Dynamic Integrated model of Climate and Economy), PAGE (Policy Analysis of the Greenhouse Effect), and FUND (Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation, and Distribution), its exact definition and computation depend on the reference and, frequently lacking consistency within research streams whether focusing on a single model or on different models. In this study, we investigated three different methods for the computation of the SCC using the integrated assessment model DICE. While the first two methods are commonly known and used, the novel formula derived for the third method allows a direct analysis of the impact of the discount factor in the calculation of the SCC. We provide a detailed proof for the correctness of the third method and validate the consistency of all three methods by numerical experiments.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent25en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-9619-1483/work/217150135en
dc.identifier.scopus85197366268en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733810674
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.en
dc.sourceAIMS Environmental Scienceen
dc.subjectDICEen
dc.subjecteconomics of climate changeen
dc.subjectoptimal controlen
dc.subjectsensitivity analysisen
dc.subjectsocial cost of carbonen
dc.titleOn the social cost of carbon and discounting in the DICE modelen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage495en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage471en
local.contributor.affiliationBraun, Philipp; School of Engineering, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationFaulwasser, Timm; TU Dortmund Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationGrüne, Lars; University of Bayreuthen
local.contributor.affiliationKellett, Christopher M.; School of Engineering, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationSemmler, Willi; The New Schoolen
local.contributor.affiliationWeller, Steven R.; University of Newcastleen
local.identifier.citationvolume11en
local.identifier.doi10.3934/environsci.2024024en
local.identifier.pureaf3853cd-b17e-4afa-81bc-af82b5464dfaen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85197366268en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads