Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The effectiveness of predator-proofing nest sites to support the breeding of an endangered parrot

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Gautschi, Daniel
Stojanovic, Dejan
Ortiz-Catedral, Luis
Wilson, Melinda
Olsen, Penny
Macgregor, Nicholas A.
Doerr, Erik D.
Neaves, Linda E.
Crates, Ross
Brown, Sarah M.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Invasive predators present a major threat to the conservation of native species. For birds, this often comes in the form of increased nest predation. Conservation managers have used numerous interventions to reduce this risk. However, their effectiveness varies depending on the specific technique used and the predators targeted. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of nest site modifications used to protect endangered Norfolk Island Green Parrot Cyanoramphus cookii nests from introduced mammalian predators. We compared the breeding outcomes and nest site characteristics of a sample of natural, unprotected nests with those of predator-proofed nests, and examined contemporary phenology and breeding parameters. We observed moderate, but variable, breeding seasonality, and significantly fewer nesting attempts in recent years. Nests had a median clutch size of five (range = 1–10) and a median brood size of three (range = 1–7). Nest success was 74.8% (157/210) for predator-proofed nesting attempts, and 40% (4/10) for unprotected nesting attempts. Predator-proofing had a small but significant effect on daily survival rate (estimated at 0.995 for predator-proofed nests and 0.972 for unprotected nests), but did not significantly affect the number of birds fledged. We observed nest predation by both Black Rats and feral Cats at unprotected nests. Unprotected nest sites had significantly shorter chambers than predator-proofed nest sites, suggesting that while predator-proofing significantly increases nest success for Green Parrots, preferred nest site characteristics have not been preserved through modifications. These findings highlight the importance of assessing the effectiveness of management actions regularly to inform evidence-based decision-making and adaptive management.

Description

Citation

Source

Emu

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd