Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Hierarchical Planning in the IPC

dc.contributor.authorBehnke, Gregoren
dc.contributor.authorHöller, Danielen
dc.contributor.authorBercher, Pascalen
dc.contributor.authorBiundo, Susanneen
dc.contributor.authorPellier, Damienen
dc.contributor.authorFiorino, Humberten
dc.contributor.authorAlford, Ronen
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-19T21:41:34Z
dc.date.available2026-06-19T21:41:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-11en
dc.description.abstractOver the last years, the amount of research in hierarchical planning has increased, leading to significant improvements in the performance of planners. However, the research is diverging and planners are somewhat hard to compare against each other. This is mostly caused by the fact that there is no standard set of benchmark domains, nor even a common description language for hierarchical planning problems. As a consequence, the available planners support a widely varying set of features and (almost) none of them can solve (or even parse) any problem developed for another planner. With this paper, we propose to create a new track for the IPC in which hierarchical planners will compete. This competition will result in a standardised description language, broader support for core features of that language among planners, a set of benchmark problems, a means to fairly and objectively compare HTN planners, and for new challenges for planners.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent7en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-0795-4320/work/217921785en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733811671
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2019 Workshop on the International Planning Competitionen
dc.titleHierarchical Planning in the IPCen
dc.typeConference paperen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage7en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en
local.contributor.affiliationBehnke, Gregor; Ulm Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHöller, Daniel; Ulm Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBercher, Pascal; School of Computing, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBiundo, Susanne; Ulm Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationPellier, Damien; University Grenoble Alpesen
local.contributor.affiliationFiorino, Humbert; University Grenoble Alpesen
local.contributor.affiliationAlford, Ron; MITRE Corporationen
local.identifier.pured7bba341-a734-4884-a4cc-6c1ec9fa0008en
local.identifier.urlhttps://icaps19.icaps-conference.org/workshops/WIPC/index.htmlen
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads