Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Does evolutionary biology support the idea that our best theories of human cognitive evolution should be gradualist?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Brown, Rachael L.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Evolutionarily minded psychologists and philosophers routinely invoke gradualism when theorising about human cognition, assuming human cognitive evolution evolved via a series of gradual phenotypic steps from an ancestral trait to the trait of interest. I argue this assumption is neither theoretically required nor empirically well supported. Evolutionary biology provides clear cases where major phenotypic shifts occur rapidly, and there is no principled reason to exempt cognition from this pattern. Acknowledging this leads to a more nuanced view of what makes explanations of human psychology evolutionarily plausible, and of what a successful evolutionary approach to psychology should aim to provide.

Description

Citation

Source

Mind and Language

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until