Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Resolving anomalous collectivity in the 4<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> → 2<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> transition of <sup>58</sup>Fe

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Woodside, J. A.
Coombes, B. J.
Stuchbery, A. E.
Mitchell, A. J.
Reece, M.
Lane, G. J.
Gray, T. J.
Pasqualato, G.
McKie, L. J.
Spinks, N. J.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The low-excitation states of atomic nuclei in the region around the N = Z = 28 shell closure are generally well described by the shell model. Most experimental observables in the iron isotopes 56Fe, 58Fe, and 60Fe (Z = 26; N = 30, 32, 34) support a shell-model description. However, the lifetimes of the 41 + state in 58Fe in the literature result in a reduced transition strength that deviates markedly from shell-model predictions. There are three independent measurements, all in agreement and all based on the Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) or Doppler-broadened line shape method (DBLS). In this work, Coulomb-excitation measurements were performed on 56Fe and 58Fe beams to determine the ratios B(E2; 41 + → 21 + )/B(E2; 21 + → 01 + ). Thus, B(E2; 41 + → 21 + ) is determined relative to the known B(E2; 21 + → 01 + ) values. For 56Fe, B(E2; 41 + → 21 + ) = 23(4) W.u., agreeing with the adopted value. However, for 58Fe, the B(E2; 41 + → 21 + ) values obtained (for the various combinations of matrix element signs that could not be firmly established) are all significantly lower than the value derived from the previous lifetime measurements, and are in accord with shell-model calculations. The 1978 DSAM measurement of Bolotin et al. [Nucl. Phys. A 311, 75 (1978)] has been re-examined. The discrepancy between that measurement and the Coulomb-excitation measurement can be ascribed to the Lindhard-Scharff-Schiøtt (LSS) electronic stopping powers adopted for the DSAM analysis, which considerably overestimate contemporary values. Evidently, lifetime measurements from that era that are based on LSS stopping powers should be used with caution. The revised lifetime data, incorporating current stopping powers, are compared with shell-model calculations.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Physical Review C

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until