Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Peeking beneath the precision floor − II. Probing the chemo-dynamical histories of the potential globular cluster siblings, NGC 288 and NGC 362

dc.contributor.authorMonty, Stephanieen
dc.contributor.authorYong, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorMassari, Davideen
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Madeleineen
dc.contributor.authorMyeong, Gyu Chulen
dc.contributor.authorBuder, Svenen
dc.contributor.authorKarakas, Amanda I.en
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Ken C.en
dc.contributor.authorMarino, Anna F.en
dc.contributor.authorBelokurov, Vasilyen
dc.contributor.authorEvans, N. Wynen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T10:29:08Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T10:29:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-25en
dc.description.abstractThe assembly history of the Milky Way (MW) is a rapidly evolving subject, with numerous small accretion events and at least one major merger proposed in the MW's history. Accreted alongside these dwarf galaxies are globular clusters (GCs), which act as spatially coherent remnants of these past events. Using high precision differential abundance measurements from our recently published study, we investigate the likelihood that the MW clusters NGC 362 and NGC 288 are galactic siblings, accreted as part of the Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus (GSE) merger. To do this, we compare the two GCs at the 0.01 dex level for 20 + elements for the first time. Strong similarities are found, with the two showing chemical similarity on the same order as those seen between the three LMC GCs, NGC 1786, NGC 2210-, and NGC 2257. However, when comparing GC abundances directly to GSE stars, marked differences are observed. NGC 362 shows good agreement with GSE stars in the ratio of Eu to Mg and Si, as well as a clear dominance in the r- compared to the s-process, while NGC 288 exhibits only a slight r-process dominance. When fitting the two GC abundances with a GSE-like galactic chemical evolution model, NGC 362 shows agreement with both the model predictions and GSE abundance ratios (considering Si, Ni, Ba, and Eu) at the same metallicity. This is not the case for NGC 288. We propose that the two are either not galactic siblings, or GSE was chemically inhomogeneous enough to birth two similar, but not identical clusters with distinct chemistry relative to constituent stars.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent17en
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711en
dc.identifier.scopus85159850417en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159850417&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733754892
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.en
dc.sourceMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyen
dc.subjectGalaxy: formationen
dc.subjectglobular clusters: generalen
dc.subjectglobular clusters: individual: NGC 288en
dc.subjectglobular clusters: individual: NGC 362en
dc.subjectstars: abundancesen
dc.subjecttechniques: spectroscopicen
dc.titlePeeking beneath the precision floor − II. Probing the chemo-dynamical histories of the potential globular cluster siblings, NGC 288 and NGC 362en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage4420en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage4404en
local.contributor.affiliationMonty, Stephanie; Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationYong, David; Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMassari, Davide; Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Bolognaen
local.contributor.affiliationMcKenzie, Madeleine; RSAA - Stromlo, Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMyeong, Gyu Chul; Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysicsen
local.contributor.affiliationBuder, Sven; Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationKarakas, Amanda I.; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationFreeman, Ken C.; Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMarino, Anna F.; Astronomical Observatory of Paduaen
local.contributor.affiliationBelokurov, Vasily; University of Cambridgeen
local.contributor.affiliationEvans, N. Wyn; University of Cambridgeen
local.identifier.citationvolume522en
local.identifier.doi10.1093/mnras/stad1154en
local.identifier.puredc78ba38-a848-4317-b629-a8eaf0478b5fen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85159850417en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads