Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Multifaceted intervention to increase the delivery of alcohol brief interventions in primary care: a mixed-methods process analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Sturgiss, Elizabeth
Advocat, Jenny
Lam, Tina
Nielsen, Suzanne
Ball, Lauren
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
Martin, Catherine
Barton, Chris
Wah Michael Tam, Chun
Skouteris, Helen

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Background Brief interventions (BIs) are effective for reducing harmful alcohol consumption, but their use in primary care is less frequent than clinically indicated. The REducing AlCohol-related Harm (REACH) project aimed to increase the delivery of BIs in primary care. Aim To assess the effectiveness of the REACH programme in increasing alcohol BIs in general practice and explore the implementation factors that improve or reduce uptake by clinicians. Design and setting This article reports on a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study of the implementation of the REACH project in six general practice clinics serving low-income communities in Melbourne, Australia. Method Time-series analyses were conducted using routinely collected patient records and semi-structured interviews, guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research. Results The six intervention sites significantly increased their rate of recorded alcohol status (56.7% to 60.4%), whereas there was no significant change in the non-intervention practices (344 sites, 55.2% to 56.4%). Conclusion REACH resources were seen as useful and acceptable by clinicians and staff. National policies that support the involvement of primary care in alcohol harm reduction helped promote ongoing intervention sustainability.

Description

Citation

Source

British Journal of General Practice

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until