Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Transgenic white clover. Studies with the auxin-responsive promoter, GH3, in root gravitropism and lateral root development

dc.contributor.authorLarkin, P. J.en
dc.contributor.authorGibson, J. M.en
dc.contributor.authorMathesius, U.en
dc.contributor.authorWeinman, J. J.en
dc.contributor.authorGartner, E.en
dc.contributor.authorHall, E.en
dc.contributor.authorTanner, G. J.en
dc.contributor.authorRolfe, B. G.en
dc.contributor.authorDjordjevic, M. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T19:24:25Z
dc.date.available2025-05-23T19:24:25Z
dc.date.issued1996en
dc.description.abstractWe report an improved method for white clover (Trifolium repens) transformation using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. High efficiencies of transgenic plant production were achieved using cotyledons of imbibed mature seed. Transgenic plants were recovered routinely from over 50% of treated cotyledons. The bar gene and phosphinothricin selection was shown to be a more effective selection system than nptII (kanamycin selection) or aadA (spectinomycin selection). White clover was transformed with the soybean auxin responsive promoter, GH3, fused to the GUS gene (β-glucuronidase) to study the involvement of auxin in root development. Analysis of 12 independent transgenic plants showed that the location and pattern of GUS expression was consistent but the levels of expression varied. The level of GH3:GUS expression in untreated plants was enhanced specifically by auxin- treatment but the pattern of expression was not altered. Expression of the GH3:GUS fusion was not enhanced by other phytohormones. A consistent GUS expression pattern was evident in untreated plants presumably in response to endogenous auxin or to differences in auxin sensitivity in various clover tissues. In untreated plants, the pattern of GH3:GUS expression was consistent with physiological responses which are regarded as being auxin- mediated. For the first time it is shown that localised spots of GH3:GUS activity occurred in root conical tissue opposite the sites where lateral roots subsequently were initiated. Newly formed lateral roots grew towards and through these islands of GH3:GUS expression, implying the importance of auxin in controlling lateral root development. Similarly, it is demonstrated for the first time that gravistimulated roots developed a rapid (within 1 h) induction of GH3:GUS activity in tissues on the non-elongating side of the responding root and this induction occurred concurrently with root curvature. These transgenic plants could be useful tools in determining the physiological and biochemical changes that occur during auxin-mediated responses.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent11en
dc.identifier.issn0962-8819en
dc.identifier.otherPubMed:11539555en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-3557-0105/work/184101676en
dc.identifier.scopus0029911087en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029911087&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733752994
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceTransgenic Researchen
dc.subjectforage legumeen
dc.subjectGUS promoter fusionen
dc.subjecttransformationen
dc.subjectTrifolium repensen
dc.subjecttropic responseen
dc.titleTransgenic white clover. Studies with the auxin-responsive promoter, GH3, in root gravitropism and lateral root developmenten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage335en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage325en
local.contributor.affiliationLarkin, P. J.; CSIROen
local.contributor.affiliationGibson, J. M.; CSIROen
local.contributor.affiliationMathesius, U.; Division of Plant Sciences, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationWeinman, J. J.; Administration, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationGartner, E.; Plant Sciences, Division of Plant Sciences, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHall, E.; Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationTanner, G. J.; CSIROen
local.contributor.affiliationRolfe, B. G.; Plant Sciences, Division of Plant Sciences, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationDjordjevic, M. A.; Administration, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume5en
local.identifier.doi10.1007/BF01968942en
local.identifier.pure8ead5675-4466-4425-bd9b-06666a768f83en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0029911087en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads