Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Different Process, Different Outcomes: A Response to Cowley, Webb and Bale

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Dowding, Keith
Bosworth, William
Guiliani, Adriano

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper responds to Cowley, Webb and Bale's critique of our paper on sortition, parties and political careers. Cowley et al. argue that within-party sortition will not increase parliamentary descriptive representation (PDR). We largely agree with that claim, which was not the focus of our original paper. If PDR is thought to be important then quotas might be necessary alongside within-party sortition. We emphasise our argument is about changing the character of parties and MPs by reducing factionalism, increasing deliberation and reducing voter scepticism about politicians by reducing patronage, clientelism and careerism. Using evidence from Morena in Mexico we suggest sortition within parties is more likely to succeed in these aims than Cowley et al.'s more sceptical counterfactual speculation on these matters.

Description

Citation

Source

Political Quarterly

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd